Hayes Bryan D, Klein-Schwartz Wendy, Clark Richard F, Muller Allison A, Miloradovich Jane E
Maryland Poison Center, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland 21230, USA.
J Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;39(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.06.030. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
Seizures and QTc prolongation are associated with citalopram poisoning; however, overdose experience with escitalopram is more limited.
The goals of this study were to compare citalopram's vs. escitalopram's clinical effects in overdose, including the incidence of seizures.
A retrospective review was conducted for single-substance acute overdoses with citalopram and escitalopram, managed in hospitals, that were reported to six U.S. poison centers from 2002-2005.
There were 374 citalopram and 421 escitalopram overdose cases. Gender and ages were similar between the two, with 68-70% females and a median age of 20 years for citalopram and 18 years for escitalopram. Median dose by history was 310 mg for citalopram and 130 mg for escitalopram. More serious outcomes were associated with citalopram overdoses (p < 0.001). Most frequently reported clinical effects with citalopram and escitalopram were tachycardia, drowsiness, hypertension, and vomiting. Seizures (30 vs. 1, respectively, p < 0.001) and tremor (32 vs. 13, respectively, p = 0.001) were more common with citalopram. QTc prolongation occurred in 14 citalopram cases and 7 escitalopram cases (p = 0.109). There was an association between increasing dose and severity of outcome for citalopram (p < 0.001) and escitalopram (p = 0.011). In children < 6 years old, 12 of 66 citalopram and 5 of 57 escitalopram cases experienced toxicity, such as drowsiness, nausea/vomiting, and tachycardia. There were no seizures in this age group.
Escitalopram seems to be less toxic than citalopram after an acute overdose; seizures and tremors were more common with citalopram. Initial management of overdoses should include seizure precautions for citalopram and cardiac monitoring for both drugs.
癫痫发作和QTc延长与西酞普兰中毒有关;然而,艾司西酞普兰的过量用药经验更为有限。
本研究的目的是比较西酞普兰与艾司西酞普兰过量用药的临床效果,包括癫痫发作的发生率。
对2002年至2005年期间在美国6家毒物中心报告的、在医院接受治疗的西酞普兰和艾司西酞普兰单物质急性过量用药情况进行回顾性分析。
西酞普兰过量用药病例374例,艾司西酞普兰过量用药病例421例。两者的性别和年龄相似,西酞普兰组女性占68 - 70%,中位年龄20岁,艾司西酞普兰组女性占68 - 70%,中位年龄18岁。根据病史,西酞普兰的中位剂量为310毫克,艾司西酞普兰为130毫克。西酞普兰过量用药与更严重的后果相关(p < 0.001)。西酞普兰和艾司西酞普兰最常报告的临床症状是心动过速、嗜睡、高血压和呕吐。癫痫发作(分别为30例和1例,p < 0.001)和震颤(分别为32例和13例,p = 0.001)在西酞普兰过量用药时更常见。14例西酞普兰病例和7例艾司西酞普兰病例出现QTc延长(p = 0.109)。西酞普兰(p < 0.001)和艾司西酞普兰(p = 0.011)的剂量增加与后果严重程度之间存在关联。在6岁以下儿童中,66例西酞普兰病例中的12例以及57例艾司西酞普兰病例中的5例出现毒性反应,如嗜睡、恶心/呕吐和心动过速。该年龄组未出现癫痫发作。
急性过量用药后,艾司西酞普兰的毒性似乎低于西酞普兰;癫痫发作和震颤在西酞普兰过量用药时更常见。过量用药的初始处理应包括针对西酞普兰的癫痫预防措施以及对两种药物的心脏监测。