• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于终止生命维持治疗的法律误区。

Legal myths about terminating life support.

作者信息

Meisel A

机构信息

Center for Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1991 Aug;151(8):1497-502.

PMID:1908215
Abstract

There are a number of myths about what the law permits concerning the termination of life support, some of which spring from a fundamental misconception of what law is. A serious misunderstanding of the law can lead to tragic results for physicians, health care institutions, patients, and families. These misunderstandings are (1) anything that is not specifically permitted by law is prohibited; (2) termination of life support is murder or suicide; (3) a patient must be terminally ill for life support to be stopped; (4) it is permissible to terminate extraordinary treatments, but not ordinary ones; (5) it is permissible to withhold treatment, but once started, it must be continued; (6) stopping tube feeding is legally different from stopping other treatments; (7) termination of life support requires going to court; and (8) living wills are not legal.

摘要

关于法律在终止生命维持方面允许什么存在许多误解,其中一些源于对法律本质的根本误解。对法律的严重误解可能给医生、医疗机构、患者及其家庭带来悲剧性后果。这些误解包括:(1)法律未明确允许的任何事情都是被禁止的;(2)终止生命维持是谋杀或自杀;(3)患者必须处于绝症状态才能停止生命维持;(4)可以终止特殊治疗,但不能终止普通治疗;(5)可以停止治疗,但一旦开始就必须继续;(6)停止鼻饲在法律上与停止其他治疗不同;(7)终止生命维持需要诉诸法庭;(8)生前预嘱不具有法律效力。

相似文献

1
Legal myths about terminating life support.关于终止生命维持治疗的法律误区。
Arch Intern Med. 1991 Aug;151(8):1497-502.
2
Shifting the burden of proof.
Second Opin. 1993 Jan;18(3):31-6.
3
Advance directives and treatment withdrawal. Legal considerations.预立医疗指示与治疗撤销。法律考量。
J Fla Med Assoc. 1994 Jan;81(1):22-6.
4
Advance directives: implications for critical care.预先指示:对重症监护的影响。
Crit Care Med. 1992 Jul;20(7):1027-31.
5
Second-generation advance directives: will reforming the law improve the practice?第二代预先指示:法律改革会改善实际情况吗?
Humane Med. 1993 Jan;9(1):57-63.
6
Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.为无行为能力者进行医疗决策:一种综合方法。
Issues Law Med. 1986 Jan;1(4):293-317.
7
Legislating advance directives for the terminally ill: the living will and durable power of attorney.为绝症患者制定预先医疗指示:生前预嘱与医疗委托授权书。
Neb Law Rev. 1984;63(4):779-809.
8
Relationship of general advance directive instructions to specific life-sustaining treatment preferences in patients with serious illness.重病患者的一般预立医疗指示与特定维持生命治疗偏好的关系。
Arch Intern Med. 1992 Oct;152(10):2114-22.
9
AIDS and living wills.艾滋病与生前预嘱。
AIDS Public Policy J. 1990 Winter;5(4):157-66.
10
Withdrawal and withholding of life-supporting food and fluids. One state's struggle.
J Fla Med Assoc. 1990 Sep;77(9):821-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The importance of word choice in the care of critically ill patients and their families.词汇选择在重症患者及其家属护理中的重要性。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Apr;40(4):606-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3201-8. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
2
Managing cats with cancer: An examination of ethical perspectives.管理患癌猫:伦理视角审视
J Feline Med Surg. 2011 Sep;13(9):661-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2011.07.019.
3
Withdrawing may be preferable to withholding.撤药可能比停药更可取。
Crit Care. 2005 Jun;9(3):226-9. doi: 10.1186/cc3486. Epub 2005 Mar 4.
4
'End-of-life' decision making within intensive care--objective, consistent, defensible?重症监护中的“临终”决策——客观、一致、合理?
J Med Ethics. 2000 Dec;26(6):435-40. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.6.435.
5
Two times what? Quantity and quality of life in tube feeding decisions.两倍的什么?管饲决策中的生活质量与数量。
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Feb;12(2):134-5.
6
Limitation of life support: frequency and practice in a London and a Cape Town intensive care unit.生命支持的限制:伦敦和开普敦重症监护病房的频率及实践
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Oct;22(10):1020-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01699222.
7
Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments.临终决策:关于维持生命治疗的专业观点
Am J Public Health. 1993 Jan;83(1):14-23. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.14.
8
The ethics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. I. Background to decision making.心肺复苏的伦理学。I. 决策背景。
Arch Dis Child. 1992 Dec;67(12):1498-501. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.12.1498.