Suppr超能文献

高流量和低流量氧化亚氮麻醉时袖带内压力的比较。

A comparison of intra cuff pressures in high-flow and low-flow nitrous oxide anesthesia.

作者信息

Postaci Aysun, Karabeyoglu Isil, Erk Gulcan, Ayerden Taner, Sastim Handan, Barcin Semiha, Dikmen Bayazit

机构信息

Department of 2nd Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2008 Dec;29(12):1719-22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate intra cuff pressure changes in low-flow anesthesia (LFA) and high-flow (HFA) N2O anesthesia during moderate-duration surgical procedures.

METHODS

We carried out this prospective, randomized, single blind study at Numune Educational and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey between January to December 2005. Seventy patients aged between 18-65 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status grades I-III, undergoing elective surgery were enrolled in this study. Following a standardized induction, anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (end-tidal 0.9-1%) at 4 L/minute for the HFA group, or 1 L/minute for the LFA group fresh gas flows. Endotracheal tube cuff (intra cuff) pressures were measured continuously with a pressure manometer, and inspired oxygen and N2O levels were noted every 10 minutes throughout the study.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between HFA and LFA groups for initial (first) cuff pressures (mean+/-SD, HFA=20.9+/-4.19, LFA=20.4+/-4.11, cmH2O), and maximum cuff pressures (MCP) (mean+/-SD, HFA=32.3+/-18.74, LFA=33.5+/-8.89, cmH2O) (p>0.05). The time to reach the maximum intra cuff pressure was significantly shorter in the LFA group (77.4+/-20.33 minutes), than the HFA group (89.3+/-23.94 minutes), (p=0.038). Between the tenth and nineteenth minutes, inspired oxygen level was significantly higher in the HFA group (p=0.001), whereas inspired N2O was significantly higher in the LFA group (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The intra cuff pressures should be monitored carefully during LFA, since the duration to reach the maximum intra cuff pressures was shorter than that of HFA.

摘要

目的

研究在中等时长的外科手术过程中,低流量麻醉(LFA)和高流量(HFA)氧化亚氮麻醉时气管导管套囊内压力的变化。

方法

2005年1月至12月期间,我们在土耳其安卡拉的努穆内教育与研究医院开展了这项前瞻性、随机、单盲研究。纳入70例年龄在18 - 65岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分级为I - III级、接受择期手术的患者。在标准化诱导后,HFA组以4 L/分钟的新鲜气体流量、LFA组以1 L/分钟的新鲜气体流量用异氟烷(呼气末浓度0.9 - 1%)维持麻醉。用压力计持续测量气管导管套囊(套囊内)压力,在整个研究过程中每10分钟记录吸入氧和氧化亚氮水平。

结果

HFA组和LFA组的初始(首次)套囊压力(均值±标准差,HFA = 20.9±4.19,LFA = 20.4±4.11,cmH₂O)以及最大套囊压力(MCP)(均值±标准差,HFA = 32.3±18.74,LFA = 33.5±8.89,cmH₂O)之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。LFA组达到最大套囊内压力的时间(77.4±20.33分钟)显著短于HFA组(89.3±23.94分钟)(p = 0.038)。在第10至19分钟之间,HFA组的吸入氧水平显著更高(p = 0.001),而LFA组的吸入氧化亚氮水平显著更高(p = 0.001)。

结论

在LFA期间应仔细监测套囊内压力,因为达到最大套囊内压力的持续时间比HFA短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验