Department of Compared Anatomy and Pathology, Córdoba University, Córdoba, Spain.
Vet Res Commun. 2009 Aug;33(6):507-13. doi: 10.1007/s11259-008-9196-x. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
The handled trot of three Lusitano Purebred stallions was analyzed by using 2D and 3D kinematical analysis methods. Using the same capture and analysis system, 2D and 3D data of some linear (stride length, maximal height of the hoof trajectories) and angular (angular range of motion, inclination of bone segments) variables were obtained. A paired Student T-test was performed in order to detect statistically significant differences between data resulting from the two methodologies With respect to the angular variables, there were significant differences in scapula inclination, shoulder angle, cannon inclination and protraction-retraction angle in the forelimb variables, but none of them were statistically different in the hind limb. Differences between the two methods were found in most of the linear variables analyzed.
采用 2D 和 3D 运动学分析方法分析了 3 匹 Lusitano 纯血种公马的受衔快步。使用相同的捕捉和分析系统,获得了一些线性(步长、蹄迹最高点)和角度(运动角度范围、骨段倾斜度)变量的 2D 和 3D 数据。为了检测两种方法之间数据的统计学差异,进行了配对学生 t 检验。就角度变量而言,在前肢变量中,肩胛骨倾斜度、肩部角度、炮骨倾斜度和前伸-后缩角度存在显著差异,但在后肢中,没有一个变量存在统计学差异。在所分析的大多数线性变量中,两种方法之间存在差异。