Raven Maria C, Billings John C, Goldfrank Lewis R, Manheimer Eric D, Gourevitch Marc N
Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
J Urban Health. 2009 Mar;86(2):230-41. doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9336-1. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
Patients with frequent hospitalizations generate a disproportionate share of hospital visits and costs. Accurate determination of patients who might benefit from interventions is challenging: most patients with frequent admissions in 1 year would not continue to have them in the next. Our objective was to employ a validated regression algorithm to case-find Medicaid patients at high-risk for hospitalization in the next 12 months and identify intervention-amenable characteristics to reduce hospitalization risk. We obtained encounter data for 36,457 Medicaid patients with any visit to an urban public hospital from 2001 to 2006 and generated an algorithm-based score for hospitalization risk in the subsequent 12 months for each patient (0 = lowest, 100 = highest). To determine medical and social contributors to the current admission, we conducted in-depth interviews with high-risk hospitalized patients (scores >50) and analyzed associated Medicaid claims data. An algorithm-based risk score >50 was attained in 2,618 (7.2%) patients. The algorithm's positive predictive value was equal to 0.67. During the study period, 139 high-risk patients were admitted: 60 met inclusion criteria and 50 were interviewed. Fifty-six percent cited the Emergency Department as their usual source of care or had none. Sixty-eight percent had >1 chronic medical conditions, and 42% were admitted for conditions related to substance use. Sixty percent were homeless or precariously housed. Mean Medicaid expenditures for the interviewed patients were $39,188 and $84,040 per patient for the years immediately prior to and following study participation, respectively. Findings including high rates of substance use, homelessness, social isolation, and lack of a medical home will inform the design of interventions to improve community-based care and reduce hospitalizations and associated costs.
频繁住院的患者在医院就诊次数和费用中所占比例过高。准确确定可能从干预措施中受益的患者具有挑战性:大多数在一年内频繁住院的患者在次年不会继续如此。我们的目标是采用经过验证的回归算法,找出未来12个月内有高住院风险的医疗补助患者,并确定可通过干预降低住院风险的特征。我们获取了2001年至2006年期间36457名曾到城市公立医院就诊的医疗补助患者的就诊数据,并为每位患者生成了基于算法的未来12个月住院风险评分(0分=最低,100分=最高)。为了确定当前住院的医疗和社会因素,我们对高风险住院患者(评分>50)进行了深入访谈,并分析了相关的医疗补助理赔数据。2618名(7.2%)患者的基于算法的风险评分>50。该算法的阳性预测值为0.67。在研究期间,139名高风险患者入院:60名符合纳入标准,50名接受了访谈。56%的患者称急诊科是他们通常的就医渠道,或者根本没有固定就医渠道。68%的患者患有不止一种慢性疾病,42%的患者因与药物使用相关的疾病入院。60%的患者无家可归或居住条件不稳定。接受访谈患者的医疗补助平均支出在参与研究前一年和后一年分别为每位患者39188美元和84040美元。包括药物使用率高、无家可归、社会孤立以及缺乏固定医疗场所等在内的研究结果将为改善社区护理、减少住院次数及相关费用的干预措施设计提供参考。