• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善频繁住院的高危患者的护理并降低成本的干预措施:一项试点研究。

An intervention to improve care and reduce costs for high-risk patients with frequent hospital admissions: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, 462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 13;11:270. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-270.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-11-270
PMID:21995329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3212942/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A small percentage of high-risk patients accounts for a large proportion of Medicaid spending in the United States, which has become an urgent policy issue. Our objective was to pilot a novel patient-centered intervention for high-risk patients with frequent hospital admissions to determine its potential to improve care and reduce costs.

METHODS

Community and hospital-based care management and coordination intervention with pre-post analysis of health care utilization. We enrolled Medicaid fee-for-service patients aged 18-64 who were admitted to an urban public hospital and identified as being at high risk for hospital readmission by a validated predictive algorithm. Enrolled patients were evaluated using qualitative and quantitative interview techniques to identify needs such as transportation to/advocacy during medical appointments, mental health/substance use treatment, and home visits. A community housing partner initiated housing applications in-hospital for homeless patients. Care managers facilitated appropriate discharge plans then worked closely with patients in the community using a harm reduction approach.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled; all were male, 18/19 were substance users, and 17/19 were homeless. Patients had a total of 64 inpatient admissions in the 12 months before the intervention, versus 40 in the following 12 months, a 37.5% reduction. Most patients (73.3%) had fewer inpatient admissions in the year after the intervention compared to the prior year. Overall ED visits also decreased after study enrollment, while outpatient clinic visits increased. Yearly study hospital Medicaid reimbursements fell an average of $16,383 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

A pilot intervention for high-cost patients shows promising results for health services usage. We are currently expanding our model to serve more patients at additional hospitals to see if the pilot's success can be replicated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01292096.

摘要

背景

在美国,一小部分高风险患者的医疗支出占医疗补助计划(Medicaid)支出的很大比例,这已成为一个紧迫的政策问题。我们的目标是为频繁住院的高风险患者试点一种新的以患者为中心的干预措施,以确定其改善护理和降低成本的潜力。

方法

采用社区和医院为基础的护理管理和协调干预措施,对医疗保健利用情况进行前后分析。我们招募了年龄在 18-64 岁之间的医疗补助计划按服务收费患者,这些患者在城市公立医院住院,并通过经过验证的预测算法被确定为有再次住院的高风险。通过定性和定量访谈技术评估入组患者,以确定他们的需求,如就医交通/代理、心理健康/药物使用治疗和家访。社区住房合作伙伴在医院为无家可归的患者发起住房申请。护理经理协助制定适当的出院计划,然后使用减少伤害的方法在社区中与患者密切合作。

结果

共招募了 19 名患者;他们都是男性,18/19 名是药物使用者,17/19 名是无家可归者。在干预前的 12 个月中,患者总共住院 64 次,而在接下来的 12 个月中,住院次数减少到 40 次,减少了 37.5%。与前一年相比,大多数患者(73.3%)在干预后的一年中住院次数减少。研究入组后,急诊就诊次数总体减少,而门诊就诊次数增加。每位患者的年度研究医院医疗补助计划报销费用平均减少 16,383 美元。

结论

针对高成本患者的试点干预措施在医疗服务使用方面显示出有希望的结果。我们目前正在扩大我们的模式,为更多的患者提供服务,在其他医院进行服务,以确定试点的成功是否可以复制。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01292096。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec8/3212942/9acf90e1bc49/1472-6963-11-270-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec8/3212942/370f5c6b6a9d/1472-6963-11-270-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec8/3212942/f5a7069195aa/1472-6963-11-270-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec8/3212942/9acf90e1bc49/1472-6963-11-270-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec8/3212942/370f5c6b6a9d/1472-6963-11-270-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec8/3212942/f5a7069195aa/1472-6963-11-270-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec8/3212942/9acf90e1bc49/1472-6963-11-270-3.jpg

相似文献

1
An intervention to improve care and reduce costs for high-risk patients with frequent hospital admissions: a pilot study.改善频繁住院的高危患者的护理并降低成本的干预措施:一项试点研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 13;11:270. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-270.
2
Hospitalization costs associated with homelessness in New York City.纽约市与无家可归相关的住院费用。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jun 11;338(24):1734-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199806113382406.
3
Emergency department use and hospitalizations among homeless adults with substance dependence and mental disorders.有药物依赖和精神障碍的无家可归成年人的急诊科就诊情况及住院情况
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2015 Aug 5;10:17. doi: 10.1186/s13722-015-0038-1.
4
Effectiveness of a housing support team intervention with a recovery-oriented approach on hospital and emergency department use by homeless people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial.以康复为导向的住房支持团队干预对严重精神疾病 homeless 人群住院和急诊使用的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Sep 30;29:e169. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000785.
5
Medicaid patients at high risk for frequent hospital admission: real-time identification and remediable risks.高风险频繁住院的医疗补助患者:实时识别与可补救风险
J Urban Health. 2009 Mar;86(2):230-41. doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9336-1. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
6
Impact of supportive housing on substance use-related health care utilization among homeless persons who are active substance users.支持性住房对积极使用物质的无家可归者中与物质使用相关的医疗保健利用的影响。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;32:1-6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
Effect of a housing and case management program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chronically ill homeless adults: a randomized trial.住房与病例管理项目对慢性病无家可归成年人急诊就诊和住院情况的影响:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2009 May 6;301(17):1771-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.561.
8
Health care utilization following a homeless medical respite pilot program.一项无家可归者医疗暂托试点项目后的医疗保健利用情况
Public Health Nurs. 2019 May;36(3):296-302. doi: 10.1111/phn.12589. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
9
Medicaid Utilization and Spending among Homeless Adults in New Jersey: Implications for Medicaid-Funded Tenancy Support Services.新泽西州无家可归成年人的医疗补助使用和支出:对医疗补助资助的租赁支持服务的影响。
Milbank Q. 2020 Mar;98(1):106-130. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12446. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Responsive Neurostimulation in Managing Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes.反应性神经刺激在难治性癫痫治疗中的作用:临床结果的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Aug 28;16(8):e68032. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68032. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Social Risks and Health Care Use in Medically Complex Patients.医疗复杂患者的社会风险与医疗保健使用
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435199. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35199.
3
Home and Community-Based Services: A Systematic Review and Evidence Map.基于家庭和社区的服务:系统评价与证据图谱

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of a housing and case management program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chronically ill homeless adults: a randomized trial.住房与病例管理项目对慢性病无家可归成年人急诊就诊和住院情况的影响:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2009 May 6;301(17):1771-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.561.
2
Health care and public service use and costs before and after provision of housing for chronically homeless persons with severe alcohol problems.为患有严重酒精问题的长期无家可归者提供住房前后的医疗保健和公共服务使用情况及成本。
JAMA. 2009 Apr 1;301(13):1349-57. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.414.
3
Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Dec;39(16):3315-3321. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08993-3. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
4
Chronic Disease Prediction Using the Common Data Model: Development Study.使用通用数据模型进行慢性病预测:发展研究
JMIR AI. 2022 Dec 22;1(1):e41030. doi: 10.2196/41030.
5
Appropriateness of frequent use of emergency departments: A retrospective analysis in Rome, Italy.急诊频繁使用的适宜性:意大利罗马的回顾性分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 4;11:1150511. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1150511. eCollection 2023.
6
Proceedings from the 2021 SAEM Consensus Conference: Research Priorities for Interventions to Address Social Risks and Needs Identified in Emergency Department Patients.2021 年 SAEM 共识会议记录:解决急诊科患者社会风险和需求干预措施的研究重点。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 25;24(2):295-301. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.11.57293.
7
Racial Health Equity and Social Needs Interventions: A Review of a Scoping Review.种族健康公平与社会需求干预:一项系统评价综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250654. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50654.
8
Hospital-based preventative interventions for people experiencing homelessness in high-income countries: A systematic review.高收入国家针对无家可归者的医院预防性干预措施:一项系统综述。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Oct 22;54:101657. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101657. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Profiles of frequent emergency department users with chronic conditions: a latent class analysis.有慢性疾病的频繁急诊患者特征:潜在类别分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 29;12(9):e055297. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055297.
10
The success of behavioral economics in improving patient retention within an intensive primary care practice.行为经济学在提高强化初级保健实践中患者保留率方面的成功。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Dec 22;22(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01593-8.
护理协调对医疗保险受益人的住院治疗、医疗质量和医疗保健支出的影响:15项随机试验。
JAMA. 2009 Feb 11;301(6):603-18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.126.
4
Medicaid patients at high risk for frequent hospital admission: real-time identification and remediable risks.高风险频繁住院的医疗补助患者:实时识别与可补救风险
J Urban Health. 2009 Mar;86(2):230-41. doi: 10.1007/s11524-008-9336-1. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
5
Cost-effectiveness of clinical case management for ED frequent users: results of a randomized trial.急诊科频繁就诊患者临床病例管理的成本效益:一项随机试验的结果
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;26(2):155-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.021.
6
Improving the management of care for high-cost Medicaid patients.改善对高成本医疗补助患者的护理管理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Nov-Dec;26(6):1643-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1643.
7
Case finding for patients at risk of readmission to hospital: development of algorithm to identify high risk patients.发现有再次入院风险的患者:开发识别高危患者的算法
BMJ. 2006 Aug 12;333(7563):327. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38870.657917.AE. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
8
The effects of respite care for homeless patients: a cohort study.为无家可归患者提供临时护理的效果:一项队列研究。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1278-81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.067850. Epub 2006 May 30.
9
Admission intervention team: medical center based intensive case management of the seriously mentally ill.入院干预团队:基于医疗中心的严重精神疾病强化个案管理
Care Manag J. 2003 Winter;4(4):178-84. doi: 10.1891/cmaj.4.4.178.63694.
10
Transitional care of older adults hospitalized with heart failure: a randomized, controlled trial.老年心力衰竭住院患者的过渡性护理:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 May;52(5):675-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52202.x.