Handel Daniel A, McConnell K John, Wallace Neal, Gallia Charles
Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 May;51(5):614-21, 621.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
Use of the emergency department (ED) is often assumed to be an important component of health care expenditures for Medicaid enrollees. We seek to quantify the absolute and percentage of total Medicaid expenditures associated with outpatient ED visits.
This retrospective study used 2002 data from Oregon's Medicaid program. ED expenditures were defined to include hospital, physician, and ancillary services associated with any ED visit not resulting in an inpatient admission. We estimated average monthly ED expenditures in absolute values and as a percentage of total medical expenditures. Multivariate models were used to assess the effect of demographic factors and eligibility status on ED spending and use.
We analyzed expenditures for 544,729 individuals enrolled in the Oregon Medicaid program in 2002. Monthly ED-associated expenditures averaged $12.63 (95% confidence interval $12.50 to $12.77) per member, representing 6.8% of total medical expenditures. Ancillary services (laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging) accounted for 35% of ED spending. Spending for ED services was skewed; 50% of all ED expenditures could be attributed to 3.0% of enrollees who made multiple ED visits.
ED expenses are a relatively small percentage of total medical spending by Medicaid enrollees. An aggressive policy to cut ED expenditures by 25% would reduce Medicaid expenditures by less than 2% per year. Actual savings would be even smaller if reduced ED utilization were offset by increased spending at the primary care level. Because the majority of Medicaid patients do not use the ED in a given year, efforts to reduce ED expenditures may be best accomplished through targeting selected enrollees who have high ED expenditures, rather than attempting to decrease overall ED use.
人们通常认为,急诊科(ED)的使用是医疗补助参保者医疗保健支出的一个重要组成部分。我们试图量化与门诊急诊科就诊相关的医疗补助总支出的绝对值和百分比。
这项回顾性研究使用了俄勒冈州医疗补助计划2002年的数据。急诊科支出的定义包括与任何未导致住院的急诊科就诊相关的医院、医生及辅助服务费用。我们以绝对值和占医疗总支出的百分比来估算每月的急诊科平均支出。使用多变量模型来评估人口统计学因素和资格状态对急诊科支出及使用情况的影响。
我们分析了2002年参加俄勒冈州医疗补助计划的544,729人的支出情况。每月与急诊科相关的支出平均每人12.63美元(95%置信区间为12.50美元至12.77美元),占医疗总支出的6.8%。辅助服务(实验室检查和诊断成像)占急诊科支出的35%。急诊科服务支出存在偏差;所有急诊科支出的50%可归因于3.0%进行多次急诊科就诊的参保者。
急诊科费用在医疗补助参保者的医疗总支出中所占比例相对较小。一项激进政策若将急诊科支出削减25%,每年医疗补助支出减少将不到2%。如果急诊科利用率的降低被初级保健层面支出的增加所抵消,则实际节省的费用会更小。由于大多数医疗补助患者在某一年不使用急诊科,减少急诊科支出的努力最好通过针对急诊科支出高的特定参保者来实现,并不能试图减少整体急诊科使用量。