Eechaute Christophe, Vaes Peter, Duquet William
Department of Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Phys Ther Sport. 2008 May;9(2):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
To construct the chronic ankle instability scale (CAIS) and evaluate its clinimetric properties.
DESIGN/SETTING: Validation study. The test procedure was conducted at the University Hospital of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Twenty-nine patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) were selected.
Content validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, floor-ceiling effects, construct validity and the minimal detectable change of the CAIS were investigated.
After final item reduction, the CAIS contains 14 items. Weighted kappa coefficients of the items ranged from .50 to .94. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the total score was .84 (p<.05). The standard error of measurement of the total score was 2.7 points; the minimal detectable change 4.7 points. Cronbach alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from .62 to .80. The "impairments" subscale score of the CAIS did not correlate significantly with talar tilt values (Rho respectively -.05 and -.07; p>.05). The "disabilities" subscale score of the CAIS correlated significantly with both the timed test performance (Rho respectively -.38 and -.40; p<.05) and the perceived difficulty of the multiple hop test (Rho respectively -.41 and -.49; p<.05).
The CAIS is a valid and reliable instrument for quantifying the multidimensional profile of patients with CAI. Future research should investigate the responsiveness of the CAIS and determine its minimally clinical important difference.
构建慢性踝关节不稳量表(CAIS)并评估其测量学特性。
设计/地点:验证性研究。测试过程在比利时布鲁塞尔自由大学大学医院进行。
选取29例慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)患者。
研究CAIS的内容效度、重测信度、内部一致性、地板效应、天花板效应、结构效度以及最小可检测变化。
经过最终项目删减,CAIS包含14个项目。各项目的加权kappa系数范围为0.50至0.94。总分的组内相关系数为0.84(p<0.05)。总分的测量标准误为2.7分;最小可检测变化为4.7分。各分量表的Cronbach α系数范围为0.62至0.80。CAIS的“损伤”分量表得分与距骨倾斜值无显著相关性(Rho分别为-0.05和-0.07;p>0.05)。CAIS的“残疾”分量表得分与计时测试表现(Rho分别为-0.38和-0.40;p<0.05)以及多级跳测试的主观难度(Rho分别为-0.41和-0.49;p<0.05)均显著相关。
CAIS是一种有效且可靠的工具,用于量化CAI患者的多维特征。未来研究应探讨CAIS的反应度,并确定其最小临床重要差异。