Ball Elaine, Franks Helen, Jenkins Jane, McGrath Maureen, Leigh Jackie
Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Apr;29(3):284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
As a United Kingdom (UK) wide organisation, the Quality Assurance Agencies ensure that best standards in higher education are reached. Following an institutional audit within a UK University, it was recommended that annotation be introduced to promote good practice in the management and implementation of giving feedback to students on assessed work. Annotation is a handwritten comment or mark written directly onto the page of the students' script.
A review of current literature, policy and practice in relation to annotation. Random sample of student scripts analysed for versions of annotation such as content, difference, length, approach and clarity. Questionnaires distributed to staff (n=74) and students n=249), analysed using SPSS and thematic analysis.
For both staff and students, interpretations of annotation in terms of transparency of style and legibility were an issue. Both respondents agreed or strongly agreed that annotation enhances a student-centered approach to learning. For the student sample, there was an agreement or strong agreement that annotation helped inform the next assignment (82.2%). There was a recognition that annotation can convey a tone and the student survey indicated that the tone of some annotation undermines confidence. Findings show annotation is considered important by students but is different from other forms of feedback. Because annotation is written on the page it requires greater sensitivity towards students' work. Recommendations disseminate findings to develop health professional education.
The annotator's presence can influence the student's interaction with their script causing them to evaluate their original writing differently. Ramage and Bean [Ramage, J.D., Bean, J.C., 1995. Writing Arguments, third ed. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.], use two different annotated versions of the same essay to model and contrast ''reading as a believer" and ''reading as a doubter" (cited in Wolfe [Wolfe, J.L., 2002. Marginal pedagogy: how annotated texts affects writing-from-source text. Written Communication 19 (2), 297-333.]). Multiple readings can be made of one text, but how the essay is read by the lecturer has the greater impact on the student. Annotation defies any stable definition precisely because it can be practiced in so many ways. It is vital that annotation is used and received appropriately so that negative effects of annotation are minimised and the positive effects emphasised. There are a number of ways of improving annotation, and good practice guidelines are offered in the conclusion to this paper.
作为一个覆盖英国全境的组织,质量保证机构确保高等教育达到最佳标准。在对一所英国大学进行机构审核后,建议引入批注以促进在对学生评估作业给予反馈的管理和实施方面的良好做法。批注是直接写在学生作业页面上的手写评论或标记。
对与批注相关的当前文献、政策和实践进行综述。对学生作业的随机样本进行分析,以了解批注的版本,如内容、差异、长度、方法和清晰度。向教职员工(n = 74)和学生(n = 249)发放问卷,使用SPSS和主题分析进行分析。
对于教职员工和学生而言,批注在风格透明度和易读性方面的解读都是一个问题。双方受访者都同意或强烈同意批注增强了以学生为中心的学习方法。对于学生样本,有82.2%的人同意或强烈同意批注有助于为下一次作业提供信息。人们认识到批注可以传达一种语气,学生调查表明一些批注的语气会削弱信心。研究结果表明批注被学生认为很重要,但与其他形式的反馈不同。因为批注写在页面上,所以需要对学生的作业更加敏感。建议传播研究结果以发展卫生专业教育。
批注者的存在会影响学生与他们作业的互动,使他们以不同方式评估自己的原始写作。拉梅奇和比恩[拉梅奇,J.D.,比恩,J.C.,1995年。《写作论证》,第三版。艾琳与培根出版社,马萨诸塞州尼德姆高地。]使用同一篇文章的两个不同批注版本来模拟和对比“作为信徒阅读”和“作为怀疑者阅读”(引自沃尔夫[沃尔夫,J.L.,2002年。边缘教学法:批注文本如何影响从源文本写作。《书面交流》19(2),297 - 333。])。一篇文章可以有多种解读,但讲师的阅读方式对学生的影响更大。批注难以给出任何稳定的定义,恰恰是因为它可以通过多种方式来实践。至关重要的是要正确使用和接受批注,以便将批注的负面影响降至最低并强调其积极影响。有多种改进批注的方法,本文结论中提供了良好实践指南。