Dear editor - a note from any imaginary author in response to any referee.
作者信息
Kelly Brendan D
出版信息
Med Hypotheses. 2009 Mar;72(3):359. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.11.003. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
PMID:19084343
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Dear editor - a note from any imaginary author in response to any referee.尊敬的编辑——一位虚构作者回复任何审稿人的便条。
Med Hypotheses. 2009 Mar;72(3):359. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.11.003. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
2
Medical writing.医学写作。
BJU Int. 2004 Jul;94(2):225-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04953.x.
3
Biomedical review articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.生物医学综述文章：编辑对作者和同行评审者的期望
CMAJ. 1989 Aug 1;141(3):195-7.
4
Journal matters.
N Z Med J. 1985 Sep 25;98(787):797-8.
5
Licking your wounds: responding to the peer review process.舔舐伤口：应对同行评审过程。
J Forensic Nurs. 2011 Dec;7(4):157-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2011.01120.x.
6
A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.编辑选择的审稿人与作者推荐的审稿人的比较。
J Pediatr. 2007 Aug;151(2):202-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.008.
7
Guidelines for citing multiple authors.引用多位作者的指南。
Nurse Author Ed. 2004 Winter;14(1):1-4.
8
Demystifying the writing process.揭开写作过程的神秘面纱。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2005 Jan-Feb;22(1):7. doi: 10.1177/1043454204272682.
9
Ghostwriting.代笔捉刀
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2008 May;6(5):318.
10
Authorship and acknowledgements.作者身份与致谢。
Singapore Med J. 2009 Jun;50(6):563-5; quiz 566.
引用本文的文献
1
Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science.同行评议与编辑评议及其在创新科学中的作用。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2012 Oct;33(5):359-76. doi: 10.1007/s11017-012-9233-1.
Zotero 插件