Arndt Torsten, Gierten Birgit, Güssregen Brunhilde, Werle Annika, Grüner Joachim
Bioscientia, Institut für Medizinische Diagnostik GmbH, D-55218 Ingelheim, Germany.
Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Jan 30;184(1-3):e27-9. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.10.022. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
Urine-ethyl glucuronide (EtG) concentrations are considered as a specific marker of recent alcohol consumption. We describe false-positive EtG screening results by the DRI ethyl glucuronide enzyme immunoassay caused by chloral hydrate intake.
Urine-EtG-screening: DRI EtG enzyme immunoassay (Thermo Fisher Scientific Microgenics) on a Hitachi 912 analyzer. EtG- and ethyl sulfate (EtS) confirmatory analysis: LC-MS/MS with an ESI source in the negative ionization, selective reaction monitoring mode.
ethanol-abstaining women under buprenorphine-treatment (medication with levetiracetam, gabapentin, clomethiazol and chloral hydrate). Proband: self-medication with 500 mg chloral hydrate after a 5-day ethanol abstinence. EtG analysis for both in subsequent urines. Check for cross reactions of the pharmaceuticals with the EtG immunoassay by addition of pure substance (2 g/L each) to EtG-free urine.
EtG concentrations up to 8.0 mg/L or 7.0 mg/g creatinine (cut-off 0.5 mg/L or mg/g) for the patient and up to 0.28 mg/L or 0.35 mg/g for the control subject (after 500 mg chloral hydrate) were obtained by the immunoassay. LC-MS/MS could not confirm these EtG results. In fact, EtG and/or EtS were not detectable in any of the urine samples by LC-MS/MS (lower limit of detection 0.01 mg/L). Cross reactions of the pharmaceuticals, incl. the chloral hydrate metabolites trichloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid, with the DRI EtG immunoassay results were ruled out (by spiking experiments) as the underlying cause for the false-positive EtG immunoassay results.
Trichloroethyl glucuronide as an important chloral hydrate metabolite remains the most probable cross reacting substance with the DRI EtG immunoassay (unproven because of lack in pure standard). The chloral hydrate self-medication experiment clearly points to an association of the false-positive EtG immunoassay results and chloral hydrate intake. Chloral hydrate medication has to be considered as a cause for false-positive EtG screening results by the DRI EtG immunoassay even in cases with regular chloral hydrate treatment (250-1000 mg) and the more in patients with chloral hydrate tolerance (taking g/day). It is recommended that positive EtG immunoassay results always be confirmed by a more specific technique such as LC-MS/MS, including ethyl sulfate as a second minor ethanol metabolite.
尿中葡萄糖醛酸乙酯(EtG)浓度被视为近期饮酒的特异性标志物。我们描述了因摄入水合氯醛导致DRI葡萄糖醛酸乙酯酶免疫测定出现假阳性EtG筛查结果的情况。
尿EtG筛查:在日立912分析仪上采用DRI EtG酶免疫测定法(赛默飞世尔科技Microgenics公司产品)。EtG和硫酸乙酯(EtS)确证分析:采用电喷雾电离源在负离子模式下的液相色谱-串联质谱法,选择性反应监测模式。
接受丁丙诺啡治疗(同时服用左乙拉西坦、加巴喷丁、氯美噻唑和水合氯醛)的戒酒女性。受试者:戒酒5天后自行服用500 mg水合氯醛。随后对两者的尿液进行EtG分析。通过向不含EtG的尿液中添加纯物质(各2 g/L)来检查药物与EtG免疫测定的交叉反应。
免疫测定法测得患者的EtG浓度高达8.0 mg/L或7.0 mg/g肌酐(临界值为0.5 mg/L或mg/g),对照受试者(服用500 mg水合氯醛后)的EtG浓度高达0.28 mg/L或0.35 mg/g。液相色谱-串联质谱法无法确证这些EtG结果。实际上,液相色谱-串联质谱法在任何尿液样本中均未检测到EtG和/或EtS(检测下限为0.01 mg/L)。通过加样实验排除了包括水合氯醛代谢物三氯乙醇和三氯乙酸在内的药物与DRI EtG免疫测定结果的交叉反应,认为这是导致EtG免疫测定假阳性结果的潜在原因。
三氯乙基葡萄糖醛酸作为水合氯醛的一种重要代谢物,仍然是与DRI EtG免疫测定最可能发生交叉反应的物质(由于缺乏纯标准品未得到证实)。水合氯醛自行用药实验明确指出EtG免疫测定假阳性结果与水合氯醛摄入之间存在关联。即使在常规使用水合氯醛治疗(250 - 1000 mg)的情况下,甚至在对水合氯醛有耐受性(每日服用量)的患者中,水合氯醛用药也必须被视为DRI EtG免疫测定法出现EtG筛查假阳性结果的一个原因。建议EtG免疫测定阳性结果始终通过更特异的技术如液相色谱-串联质谱法进行确证,包括将硫酸乙酯作为乙醇的第二种次要代谢物进行检测。