• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

An investigation into the impact of safety features on the ergonomics of surgical scalpels.

作者信息

Wu Xuefang, Thomson Gareth, Tang Benjie

机构信息

Division of Mechanical Engineering & Mechatronics, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2009 May;40(3):424-32. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.11.003. Epub 2008 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2008.11.003
PMID:19084819
Abstract

In the case of surgical scalpels, blade retraction and disposability have been incorporated into a number of commercial designs to address sharps injury and infection transmission issues. Despite these new designs, the traditional metal reusable scalpel is still extensively used and this paper attempts to determine whether the introduction of safety features has compromised the ergonomics and so potentially the take-up of the newer designs. Examples of scalpels have been analysed to determine the ergonomic impact of these design changes. Trials and questionnaires were carried out using both clinical and non-clinical user groups, with the trials making use of assessment of incision quality, cutting force, electromyography and video monitoring. The results showed that ergonomic performance was altered by the design changes and that while these could be for the worse, the introduction of safety features could act as a catalyst to encourage re-evaluation of the ergonomic demands of a highly traditional product.

摘要

相似文献

1
An investigation into the impact of safety features on the ergonomics of surgical scalpels.
Appl Ergon. 2009 May;40(3):424-32. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.11.003. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
2
User-centered design and evaluation of a next generation fixed-split ergonomic keyboard.以用户为中心的下一代固定分体式人体工程学键盘的设计与评估。
Work. 2010;37(4):445-56. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1109.
3
ECRI study evaluates safety scalpels.ECRI研究所对安全手术刀进行评估。
OR Manager. 2001 Sep;17(9):16.
4
An ergonomic comparison of firearm safety mechanisms.枪支安全机制的人体工程学比较。
Ergonomics. 2008 Sep;51(9):1394-406. doi: 10.1080/00140130802216917.
5
Designing interactive consumer products: utility of paper prototypes and effectiveness of enhanced control labelling.设计交互式消费产品:纸质原型的效用及增强型控制标签的有效性
Appl Ergon. 2008 Jan;39(1):71-85. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 May 10.
6
Comparison of mechanical and in vivo performance of new and reprocessed harmonic scalpels.新型与再处理谐波手术刀的机械性能与体内性能比较。
Urology. 2006 May;67(5):898-903. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.027.
7
The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion.可用性测试中原型逼真度和设计美学的影响:对用户行为、主观评价及情感的作用。
Appl Ergon. 2009 Jul;40(4):670-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
8
The "hands together" method of nonsterile scalpel blade mounting and removal.双手协同法进行非无菌手术刀的安装和拆卸。
Anat Sci Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):161-6. doi: 10.1002/ase.1414. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
9
Review of system designs employs ergonomics prior to work injuries. CTDs do not need to be the result of trial-and-error processes with new or simpler equipment.系统设计审查在工伤发生之前就采用了人体工程学原理。累积性创伤失调并不一定是使用新设备或更简单设备进行反复试验的结果。
Occup Health Saf. 1993 May;62(5):88-90, 92, 105.
10
The usability and ergonomics of axes.轴的可用性与人体工程学。
Appl Ergon. 2009 Jul;40(4):790-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Oct 16.