Atai Mohammad, Motevasselian Fariba
Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Clin Oral Investig. 2009 Sep;13(3):309-16. doi: 10.1007/s00784-008-0236-2. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
The aim of the study was to investigate the temperature rise of a nanocomposite and a conventional hybrid dental composite during photopolymerization when cured with halogen curing lamp (QHT) and light-emitting diode (LED). Temperature rise during photopolymerization of two commercially available composites (Filtek Supreme(R) and TetricCeram) were measured using a K-type thermocouple and a digital thermometer. Different curing modes were utilized to cure the composites: a high-intensity QHT unit (Optilux 501) in two different modes (standard and ramp), a low-intensity QHT unit (Coltolux 50), and an LED unit (Ultralume-2). Total temperature rise, polymerization reaction exotherm, and irradiation-induced temperature rise of the composites were determined. Degree of conversion of the specimens was measured using FTIR spectroscopy. The results revealed that the Filtek Supreme nanocomposite showed lower temperature rise and degree of conversion in comparison with the hybrid composite (p < 0.05). It was also found that the LED curing unit induced considerable total and irradiation temperature rise without any improvement in the degree of conversion. Ramp curing mode showed lower temperature rise and delayed gel point and was found to be more effective than QHT standard mode and LED units. Although it is claimed that the LED curing units exhibit lower temperature rise during the photopolymerization, the present study showed that the curing units have no advantage over the conventional QHT units regarding the temperature rise and degree of polymerization conversion.
本研究的目的是调查纳米复合材料和传统混合牙科复合材料在使用卤素固化灯(QHT)和发光二极管(LED)固化时光聚合过程中的温度升高情况。使用K型热电偶和数字温度计测量两种市售复合材料(Filtek Supreme®和TetricCeram)光聚合过程中的温度升高。采用不同的固化模式对复合材料进行固化:高强度QHT装置(Optilux 501)的两种不同模式(标准模式和斜坡模式)、低强度QHT装置(Coltolux 50)以及LED装置(Ultralume-2)。测定了复合材料的总温度升高、聚合反应放热以及辐照引起的温度升高。使用傅里叶变换红外光谱法测量试样的转化率。结果显示,与混合复合材料相比,Filtek Supreme纳米复合材料的温度升高和转化率较低(p < 0.05)。还发现,LED固化装置导致了相当大的总温度升高和辐照温度升高,而转化率却没有任何提高。斜坡固化模式显示出较低的温度升高和延迟的凝胶点,并且被发现比QHT标准模式和LED装置更有效。尽管据称LED固化装置在光聚合过程中温度升高较低,但本研究表明,在温度升高和聚合转化率方面,这些固化装置并不比传统的QHT装置有优势。