Schultheiss Oliver C, Yankova Diana, Dirlikov Benjamin, Schad Daniel J
Department of Psychology and Sport Sciences, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
J Pers Assess. 2009 Jan;91(1):72-81. doi: 10.1080/00223890802484456.
Previous studies that have examined the relationship between implicit and explicit motive measures have consistently found little variance overlap between both types of measures regardless of thematic content domain (i.e., power, achievement, affiliation). However, this independence may be artifactual because the primary means of measuring implicit motives--content-coding stories people write about picture cues--are incommensurable with the primary means of measuring explicit motives: having individuals fill out self-report scales. To provide a better test of the presumed independence between both types of measures, we measured implicit motives with a Picture Story Exercise (PSE; McClelland, Koestner, & Weinberger, 1989) and explicit motives with a cue- and response-matched questionnaire version of the PSE (PSE-Q) and a traditional measure of explicit motives, the Personality Research Form (PRF; Jackson, 1984) in 190 research participants. Correlations between the PSE and the PSE-Q were small and mostly nonsignificant, whereas the PSE-Q showed significant variance overlap with the PRF within and across thematic domains. We conclude that the independence postulate holds even when more commensurable measures of implicit and explicit motives are used.
以往研究隐式动机与显式动机测量之间关系时,无论主题内容领域(即权力、成就、归属)如何,始终发现这两种测量方式之间几乎没有方差重叠。然而,这种独立性可能是人为造成的,因为测量隐式动机的主要方法——对人们根据图片线索编写的故事进行内容编码——与测量显式动机的主要方法不可通约:让个体填写自我报告量表。为了更好地检验这两种测量方式之间假定的独立性,我们对190名研究参与者使用图片故事练习(PSE;麦克莱兰、科斯特纳和温伯格,1989)测量隐式动机,使用与PSE线索和反应匹配的问卷版本(PSE-Q)以及显式动机的传统测量方法——人格研究表(PRF;杰克逊,1984)测量显式动机。PSE与PSE-Q之间的相关性较小且大多不显著,而PSE-Q在主题领域内和跨主题领域与PRF均显示出显著的方差重叠。我们得出结论,即使使用更具可比性的隐式和显式动机测量方法,独立性假设仍然成立。