Suppr超能文献

使用主题统觉测验研究版评估内隐动机:图片概况、性别差异以及与其他人格测量的关系。

Assessment of implicit motives with a research version of the TAT: picture profiles, gender differences, and relations to other personality measures.

作者信息

Schultheiss O C, Brunstein J C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1109, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2001 Aug;77(1):71-86. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7701_05.

Abstract

Four hundred twenty-eight participants wrote imaginative stories in response to 6 picture cues of a research version of the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT; Morgan & Murray, 1935). Story protocols were coded for n (need) Power, n Achievement, and n Affiliation using Winter's (1991) integrated scoring system that provided detailed information about the motive profiles of individual picture cues. In general, picture cues differed strongly from each other with regard to how many scorable instances of power, achievement, or affiliation imagery they elicited. The n Affiliation, but not n Power, n Achievement, or activity inhibition--a measure of impulse control--was found to be higher in (a) women than in men and (b) individuals tested in a group than in individuals tested individually. TAT motive measures showed no significant overlap with questionnaire measures of motivational orientation (German Personality Research Form; Stumpf, Angleitner, Wieck, Jackson, & Beloch-Till, 1985) or traits (German NEO-Five-Factor Inventory; Borkenau & Ostendorf, 1993).

摘要

428名参与者根据主题统觉测验(TAT;摩根和默里,1935年)研究版本的6张图片线索创作了富有想象力的故事。使用温特(1991年)的综合评分系统对故事记录进行编码,以分析权力需求(n权力)、成就需求(n成就)和归属需求(n归属),该系统提供了有关各个图片线索动机概况的详细信息。总体而言,图片线索在引发的权力、成就或归属意象的可计分实例数量方面彼此差异很大。研究发现,归属需求(n归属)而非权力需求(n权力)、成就需求(n成就)或冲动控制指标(活动抑制)在以下方面更高:(a)女性高于男性;(b)接受团体测试的个体高于单独测试的个体。TAT动机测量结果与动机取向问卷测量(德国人格研究表;施通普夫、安格勒特纳、维克、杰克逊和贝洛赫-蒂尔,1985年)或特质问卷测量(德国NEO五因素量表;博尔科瑙和奥斯特endorf,1993年)没有显著重叠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验