• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性前列腺切除术后6个月的尿道压力分布图可能有助于诊断括约肌性尿失禁:12个月随访后的初步数据。

Urethral pressure profile 6 months after radical prostatectomy may be diagnostic of sphincteric incontinence: preliminary data after 12 months' follow-up.

作者信息

Bentzon Diem Nguyen, Graugaard-Jensen Charlotte, Borre Michael

机构信息

Department of Urology, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2009;43(2):114-8. doi: 10.1080/00365590802603018.

DOI:10.1080/00365590802603018
PMID:19085324
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Male stress incontinence is mainly caused by sphincter lesions, representing the majority of incontinent patients after retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). Reflecting the sphincter activity, the urethral pressure profile (UPP) was used to evaluate 65 consecutive patients 6 months after retropubic RRP to identify patients with persistent sphincteric incontinence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

According to the history of continence, patients were divided into a continent group and three incontinent subgroups. Six months postoperatively, spontaneous flow and two cystometries were performed with a filling rate of 60 ml/min, immediately followed by pressure flow and two UPPs, flow rate 1 ml with a pulling rate of 2 mm/s, focusing on functional length (FL) and maximal urethral closure pressure (MUCP). At 6 and 12 months' follow-up, questionnaires were filled in concerning the present state of continence.

RESULTS

After RRP, two-thirds were continent after 6 months, whereas one-third still suffered from incontinence. MUCP and FL in the stress incontinent group had decreased significantly compared with the continent group (66.2+/-26.4 vs 21.0+/-13.6 cmH(2)O, p< or =0.001; and 11.4+/-3.7 and 8.2+/-3.7 mm, p=0.05), accompanied by a characteristic UPP configuration. After 12 months subgroups of sphincter incontinence and bladder and sphincter combined experienced no change, whereas the group with bladder incontinence achieved satisfactory improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative urodynamics after 6 months may be predictive for persistent incontinence at the bladder, sphincter, and both, suggesting that immediate intervention is more appropriate than watchful waiting. Sphincter incontinence was diagnosed by stress incontinence with MUCP below 30 cmH(2)O, decreased FL and a distinctive profile.

摘要

目的

男性压力性尿失禁主要由括约肌损伤引起,是耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)后尿失禁患者的主要组成部分。为了评估耻骨后RRP术后6个月持续存在括约肌性尿失禁的患者,采用尿道压力分布图(UPP)来反映括约肌活动情况,对65例连续患者进行了评估。

材料与方法

根据尿失禁病史,将患者分为控尿组和三个尿失禁亚组。术后6个月,以60 ml/min的充盈速度进行自发性排尿和两次膀胱测压,随后立即进行压力流测定和两次UPP测定,流速为1 ml,牵拉速度为2 mm/s,重点关注功能长度(FL)和最大尿道闭合压(MUCP)。在6个月和12个月随访时,填写关于尿失禁现状的问卷。

结果

RRP术后6个月,三分之二的患者实现控尿,而三分之一的患者仍存在尿失禁。与控尿组相比,压力性尿失禁组的MUCP和FL显著降低(66.2±26.4 vs 21.0±13.6 cmH₂O,p≤0.001;11.4±3.7和8.2±3.7 mm,p = 0.05),同时伴有特征性的UPP形态。12个月后,括约肌性尿失禁组和膀胱与括约肌联合性尿失禁组无变化,而膀胱性尿失禁组有满意的改善。

结论

术后6个月的尿动力学检查可能有助于预测膀胱、括约肌或两者持续存在的尿失禁情况,这表明立即干预比观察等待更合适。括约肌性尿失禁的诊断标准为压力性尿失禁、MUCP低于30 cmH₂O、FL降低以及独特的形态。

相似文献

1
Urethral pressure profile 6 months after radical prostatectomy may be diagnostic of sphincteric incontinence: preliminary data after 12 months' follow-up.根治性前列腺切除术后6个月的尿道压力分布图可能有助于诊断括约肌性尿失禁:12个月随访后的初步数据。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2009;43(2):114-8. doi: 10.1080/00365590802603018.
2
Effect of radical prostatectomy on sensory threshold and pressure transmission.根治性前列腺切除术对感觉阈值和压力传导的影响。
J Urol. 2000 Jun;163(6):1761-6.
3
Urinary incontinence and voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy (prospective urodynamic study).耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后的尿失禁和排尿功能障碍(前瞻性尿动力学研究)
Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(1):2-7. doi: 10.1002/nau.20190.
4
Urodynamic evaluation of changes in urinary control after radical retropubic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后控尿变化的尿动力学评估
J Urol. 1997 Jan;157(1):233-6.
5
Urodynamic quantification of decrease in sphincter function after radical prostatectomy: relation to postoperative continence status and the effect of intensive pelvic floor muscle exercises.根治性前列腺切除术后括约肌功能下降的尿动力学定量评估:与术后控尿状态的关系及盆底肌强化锻炼的效果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Jun;31(5):646-51. doi: 10.1002/nau.21243. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
6
[Urodynamics of urinary incontinence post radical prostatectomy].[根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的尿动力学研究]
Arch Esp Urol. 1998 Oct;51(8):801-10.
7
Role of bladder neck preservation in urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy.膀胱颈保留在耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁中的作用。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38(1):32-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590310017280.
8
Analysis of risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的危险因素分析。
Urol Int. 2007;78(3):202-7. doi: 10.1159/000099338.
9
[Urodynamic parameters and continence after radical Wertheim-Meigs-Okabayashi hysterectomy].[根治性韦特海姆-梅格斯-冈林子宫切除术后的尿动力学参数与尿失禁情况]
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1997;119(10):476-82.
10
Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up.根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁:根据定义的发生率、危险因素及长期随访的大型队列研究中的时间趋势
BJU Int. 2006 Jun;97(6):1234-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06185.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence Through the Combination of the Urethral Pressure Profile With Electromyography of the Urethral Sphincter.通过尿道压力曲线与尿道括约肌肌电图相结合预测根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁
Int Neurourol J. 2022 Feb;26(Suppl 1):S68-75. doi: 10.5213/inj.2142030.015. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
Appropriate preoperative membranous urethral length predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.术前适当的膜尿道长度可预测机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后尿控的恢复情况。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 16;16(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1523-2.
3
Preoperative Membranous Urethral Length Measurement and Continence Recovery Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
前列腺癌根治术后术前膜性尿道长度测量与控尿恢复:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):368-378. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jul 6.