• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声与磁共振成像在胎儿头部和躯干畸形诊断中的比较

Ultrasound versus MRI in the diagnosis of fetal head and trunk anomalies.

作者信息

Rajeswaran Rangasami, Chandrasekharan Anupama, Joseph Santhosh, Venkata Sai P M, Dev Bhawna, Reddy Sanjeeva

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, India.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Feb;22(2):115-23. doi: 10.1080/14767050802488238.

DOI:10.1080/14767050802488238
PMID:19085633
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare antenatal sonography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of fetal head and trunk anomalies.

METHODS

Forty pregnant women with fetal anomalies on ultrasound (US) examination underwent MRI. The MR examination was done by a radiologist who was provided with the US data. The MR images were then read by one of the two radiologists who were blinded to the US data. They were however told that the region of interest was (1) head-neck or (2) trunk or (3) both. Antenatal US and MRI findings were compared with postnatal diagnosis. Postnatal evaluation included plain radiograph, US, computed tomography, MRI, surgery, physical evaluation and autopsy.

RESULTS

Sixty anomalies were detected in the 40 women studied. This included 36 central nervous system (CNS), 7 thoracic, 7 gastrointestinal, 8 genitourinary and 2 face-neck anomalies. In the evaluation of CNS and thoracic anomalies, more number of confident diagnoses could be obtained by MRI when compared with that by US. In the detection of gastrointestinal and genitourinary anomalies, there was no significant difference between the two modalities.

CONCLUSION

More number of confident diagnoses could be obtained by MRI when compared with that by US, in the evaluation of fetal CNS and thoracic anomalies. MRI can be used in complex fetal anomalies as a supplementary tool following US.

摘要

目的

比较产前超声检查与磁共振成像(MRI)在诊断胎儿头部和躯干异常中的应用。

方法

40例超声(US)检查发现胎儿异常的孕妇接受了MRI检查。MR检查由一位已获得US数据的放射科医生进行。然后,由两位对US数据不知情的放射科医生之一阅读MR图像。不过,他们被告知感兴趣的区域为(1)头颈或(2)躯干或(3)两者。将产前US和MRI检查结果与产后诊断结果进行比较。产后评估包括X线平片、US、计算机断层扫描、MRI、手术、体格检查和尸检。

结果

在研究的40例女性中检测到60处异常。其中包括36处中枢神经系统(CNS)异常、7处胸部异常、7处胃肠道异常、8处泌尿生殖系统异常和2处面颈部异常。在评估CNS和胸部异常时,与US相比,MRI能获得更多确切的诊断。在检测胃肠道和泌尿生殖系统异常方面,两种检查方式之间没有显著差异。

结论

在评估胎儿CNS和胸部异常时,与US相比,MRI能获得更多确切的诊断。MRI可作为US之后用于复杂胎儿异常的辅助工具。

相似文献

1
Ultrasound versus MRI in the diagnosis of fetal head and trunk anomalies.超声与磁共振成像在胎儿头部和躯干畸形诊断中的比较
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Feb;22(2):115-23. doi: 10.1080/14767050802488238.
2
The diagnostic role of "in utero" magnetic resonance imaging.“宫内”磁共振成像的诊断作用。
J Perinat Med. 1999;27(4):303-8. doi: 10.1515/JPM.1999.043.
3
[Evaluation of malformations of the fetal central nervous system using fetal MRI].[利用胎儿磁共振成像评估胎儿中枢神经系统畸形]
Rofo. 2008 Aug;180(8):715-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027433. Epub 2008 May 16.
4
Magnetic resonance imaging in fetal anomalies: What does it add to 3D and 4D US?磁共振成像在胎儿畸形中的应用:与 3D 和 4D US 相比,它有何优势?
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Apr;74(1):250-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.041. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
5
Contribution of MRI to ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal anomalies.MRI 对超声在胎儿畸形诊断中的作用。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Apr;35(4):882-90. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23502. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
6
[Magnetic resonance imaging as a prenatal diagnostic tool supplementary to ultrasound in diagnosing fetal and gestational abnormalities].[磁共振成像作为产前诊断工具在补充超声诊断胎儿及妊娠异常中的应用]
Harefuah. 2002 Apr;141(4):329-34, 412, 411.
7
Fast MR imaging and ultrafast MR imaging of fetal central nervous system abnormalities.胎儿中枢神经系统异常的快速磁共振成像和超快磁共振成像
Osaka City Med J. 2001 Dec;47(2):127-35.
8
Fetal anomalies: comparison of MR imaging and US for diagnosis.胎儿畸形:磁共振成像与超声诊断的比较
Radiology. 2004 Aug;232(2):398-404. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2322030504.
9
Abnormalities of the upper extremities on fetal magnetic resonance imaging.胎儿磁共振成像上的上肢异常。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;38(5):559-67. doi: 10.1002/uog.8949.
10
The fetal dandy walker complex: associated anomalies, perinatal outcome and postnatal imaging.胎儿丹迪-沃克综合征:相关畸形、围产期结局及产后影像学表现
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007;22(4):277-81. doi: 10.1159/000100790.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging spectrum of posterior fossa anomalies on foetal magnetic resonance imaging with an algorithmic approach to diagnosis.胎儿磁共振成像上后颅窝异常的影像谱及诊断算法方法
Pol J Radiol. 2021 Mar 30;86:e183-e194. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2021.105014. eCollection 2021.
2
Utility of Various Ultrafast Magnetic Resonance Sequences in the Detection of Fetal Intracranial Hemorrhage.各种超快磁共振序列在胎儿颅内出血检测中的效用
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2018 Oct-Dec;21(4):275-279. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_431_17.
3
Different information by MRI compare to ultrasound in fetal intracranial space occupying lesions.
胎儿颅内占位性病变中,与超声相比,磁共振成像(MRI)提供的信息不同。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Dec;33(12):2129-2136. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3505-z. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero.一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定磁共振成像对产前胎儿脑异常诊断的贡献。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jun;27(6):2367-2380. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4563-4. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of fetal anomalies: a blinded case-control study.超声检查和磁共振成像检测胎儿异常的诊断准确性:一项盲法病例对照研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;48(2):185-92. doi: 10.1002/uog.15774. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
6
Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of gastrointestinal fetal anomalies.磁共振成像在胎儿胃肠道畸形产前诊断中的作用。
Radiol Med. 2015 Apr;120(4):393-403. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0464-2. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
Fetal MRI as a complement to US in the evaluation of cleft lip and palate.胎儿磁共振成像作为 US 在唇腭裂评估中的补充。
Radiol Med. 2011 Oct;116(7):1134-48. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0683-8. Epub 2011 Apr 19.