Becher C, Renke A, Heyse T J, Schofer M, Tibesku C O, Fuchs-Winkelmann S
Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 Nov-Dec;146(6):773-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039000. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty is discussed controversially. The aim of this nation-wide survey in Germany and review of the literature was to determine the current status of patellofemoral arthroplasty.
A standardised questionnaire was sent to 744 German departments of orthopaedic surgery, traumatology and general surgery. In the first part, surgeons were asked general questions about their department size, case numbers of knee arthroplasties per year and non-endoprosthetic treatment of isolated patellofemoral disorders. If patellofemoral arthroplasty was conducted, parameters concerning age, gender, duration of complaints, indication for surgery, surgical approach, type of endoprosthesis used, additional surgical treatments and failures were evaluated in the second part. Furthermore we asked for the reasons if no isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty was performed. A systematic review of the literature was done including studies published until October 2007. The main inclusion criterion was the presentation of results after the implantation of a patellofemoral prosthesis for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
A total of 225 analysable questionnaires were returned. Of 53,420 knee arthroplasties performed per year, only 195 (0.37 %) were isolated patellofemoral arthroplasties. The majority of patients (91 %) were between 40 and 80 years old. The aetiology of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis was believed to be idiopathic in 41 % and traumatic in 8 %. Patellofemoral dysplasia was held to be responsible in 47 % and patellofemoral instability in 4 % of the cases. The main reason for failure and surgical revision was ongoing tibiofemoral osteoarthritis of the affected knee. Negative attitude and disbelief towards the success of isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty were stated by the majority (62 %) of non-users. A lack of appropriate indications was reported by 22 % and lacking know-how by 16 %. We analysed 12 studies (459 implantations; 390 patients) in the literature review. The treatment was considered successful in 67.8 % of cases. The overall revision rate was 30.3 %. The highest failure rates were in patients with progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis or malalignment.
Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty has only low significance among surgeons performing knee arthroplasty in Germany. The majority of surgeons do not believe in the success of the procedure. Almost one third of published cases in the literature needed to be revised.
孤立性髌股关节置换术存在争议。这项在德国开展的全国性调查及文献综述的目的是确定髌股关节置换术的现状。
向744个德国骨科、创伤外科和普通外科科室发送了标准化问卷。在第一部分,询问外科医生关于其科室规模、每年膝关节置换病例数以及孤立性髌股关节疾病的非假体治疗等一般性问题。如果进行了髌股关节置换术,在第二部分评估有关年龄、性别、症状持续时间、手术指征、手术入路、使用的假体类型、额外的手术治疗和失败情况等参数。此外,我们询问了未进行孤立性髌股关节置换术的原因。对文献进行了系统综述,纳入截至2007年10月发表的研究。主要纳入标准是报道孤立性髌股关节骨关节炎植入髌股关节假体后的结果。
共返回225份可分析问卷。每年进行的53420例膝关节置换术中,只有195例(0.37%)是孤立性髌股关节置换术。大多数患者(91%)年龄在40至80岁之间。孤立性髌股关节骨关节炎的病因被认为41%为特发性,8%为创伤性。47%的病例归因于髌股发育不良,4%归因于髌股不稳定。失败和手术翻修的主要原因是患侧膝关节存在胫股关节骨关节炎。大多数(62%)未使用者表示对孤立性髌股关节置换术的成功持消极态度和怀疑态度。22%的人报告缺乏合适的指征,16%的人报告缺乏专业知识。在文献综述中,我们分析了12项研究(459例植入;390例患者)。67.8%的病例治疗被认为成功。总体翻修率为30.3%。胫股关节骨关节炎进展或对线不良的患者失败率最高。
在德国进行膝关节置换术的外科医生中,孤立性髌股关节置换术的重要性较低。大多数外科医生不相信该手术会成功。文献中近三分之一的已发表病例需要翻修。