Suppr超能文献

通过电话收集药物滥用数据的可行性。

The feasibility of collecting drug abuse data by telephone.

作者信息

Gfroerer J C, Hughes A L

机构信息

National Institute on Drug Abuse, Division of Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Survey and Analysis Branch, Rockville, MD 20857.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 1991 Jul-Aug;106(4):384-93.

Abstract

An evaluation was made of the use of telephone survey methods to collect illicit drug use data. Using data from a national survey that collects data by personal interviews, marijuana and cocaine use prevalence rates among households with telephones and those without were compared in order to assess coverage errors in telephone surveys. Drug use rates were substantially higher among households without telephones, with 24.9 percent of those living in households without telephones reporting use of marijuana in the past year, compared with only 9.4 percent of persons living in households with telephones. Trends in drug use were divergent, with substantial decreases in use occurring between 1985 and 1988 in households with telephones, but not in those without. National prevalence patterns and trends among households with telephone appear to be consistent with national patterns and trends in the total household population, because about 93 percent of the population lives in households with telephones. However, surveys conducted by telephone were found to produce underestimates of illicit drug use prevalence. In a 1988 national telephone survey, estimated rates of past year use were 5.2 percent for marijuana and 1.4 percent for cocaine. Comparable data from a personal visit survey (including only households with telephones and reedited and reweighted to control for differences in data collection protocols) were 8.0 percent for marijuana and 3.1 percent for cocaine use. Comparisons with several other telephone surveys collecting illicit drug use data showed similar results. Based on these results, researchers are advised to use caution in using telephone surveys to produce drug use prevalence estimates.

摘要

对使用电话调查方法收集非法药物使用数据的情况进行了评估。利用一项通过个人访谈收集数据的全国性调查的数据,比较了有电话家庭和无电话家庭中大麻和可卡因的使用流行率,以评估电话调查中的覆盖误差。无电话家庭中的药物使用率显著更高,在无电话家庭中生活的人中有24.9%报告在过去一年中使用过大麻,而在有电话家庭中生活的人中这一比例仅为9.4%。药物使用趋势存在差异,1985年至1988年期间,有电话家庭中的药物使用大幅下降,而无电话家庭中则没有。有电话家庭中的全国流行模式和趋势似乎与全国家庭人口的模式和趋势一致,因为约93%的人口生活在有电话的家庭中。然而,发现通过电话进行的调查会低估非法药物使用流行率。在1988年的一项全国电话调查中,过去一年使用大麻的估计率为5.2%,使用可卡因的估计率为1.4%。来自个人走访调查(仅包括有电话家庭,并重新编辑和加权以控制数据收集协议的差异)的可比数据显示,大麻使用为8.0%,可卡因使用为3.1%。与其他几项收集非法药物使用数据的电话调查的比较显示了类似的结果。基于这些结果,建议研究人员在使用电话调查得出药物使用流行率估计值时要谨慎。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Sources of Error in Substance Use Prevalence Surveys.物质使用流行率调查中的误差来源。
Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Nov 5;2014:923290. doi: 10.1155/2014/923290. eCollection 2014.
8
Suicidal ideation in primary care.基层医疗中的自杀意念
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Aug;11(8):447-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02599038.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验