• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻息肉内镜手术治疗中保留中鼻甲与切除中鼻甲的对比

Middle turbinate preservation versus middle turbinate resection in endoscopic surgical treatment of nasal polyposis.

作者信息

Marchioni Daniele, Alicandri-Ciufelli Matteo, Mattioli Francesco, Marchetti Alessio, Jovic Gordana, Massone Federica, Presutti Livio

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 Sep;128(9):1019-26. doi: 10.1080/00016480701827541.

DOI:10.1080/00016480701827541
PMID:19086309
Abstract

CONCLUSION

Relapse in patients affected by nasal polyposis and subjected to endoscopic surgery appears to be a relevant feature. Surgical treatment shows a significant increase in quality of life in all the patients aside from surgical technique used. Our results show a better control of relapse of nasal pathology in patients subjected to more radical surgery (group B) vs patients subjected to conservative surgery on middle turbinate (group A). Allergic patients in group B had a smaller number of relapses during the follow-up period compared with allergic patients in group A and this was statistically significant.

OBJECTIVES

Different endoscopic surgical techniques have been applied for the treatment of nasal polyposis. During ethmoidectomy, some authors prefer to remove the middle turbinate while others preserve this structure. To date, there have been no studies comparing the results, in a homogeneous case series of patients operated exclusively for nasal polyposis, between those whose middle turbinate was resected and those whose middle turbinate was preserved. The aim of our study was to compare results in these two groups of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study was performed. Nasal polyposis was studied on the basis of endoscopic examination and all the patients were classified on the basis of CT of paranasal sinuses using the Kennedy CT staging system. In the study group, only subjects affected by nasal polyposis with stage II-III at endoscopic evaluation and a Kennedy score of III-IV, affected by nasal polyposis, and not responsive to medical treatment were recruited. The presence of allergy was evaluated by skin prick test results and that of asthma by spirometric examination. Recurrence rates and quality of life were evaluated in a 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 56 patients were selected and all were observed over a 3-year follow-up period. We identified two groups: group A, 34 patients (60.71%) affected by nasal polyposis who underwent endoscopic surgery with the conservation of middle turbinate; group B, 22 patients (39.29%) affected by nasal polyposis who underwent more radical endoscopic sinus surgery. Analyzing the entire study group, during the 3-year follow-up, 20 (35.71%) of the 56 patients had a relapse of nasal polyposis. Analyzing time to relapse curves in the allergic and non-allergic patients, we obtained a p value of 0.0589, i.e. at the limit of statistical significance. The comparison between preoperative and postoperative Cologne test in the whole study group was statistically significant for a symptomatic improvement (p < 0.001). Trends within the two groups were also evaluated: there was a statistically significant difference in behavior upon time to relapse of the patients in group B vs group A (p = 0.0102). The patients in group A developed nasal recurrence more frequently during the follow-up periods. In patients affected by allergy vs patients not affected by allergy in group A, a statistically significant difference was noted (p = 0.0074); the allergic patients developed nasal recurrence more frequently during the follow-up period. We could not find a statistically significant difference between those patients affected by allergy and those not affected by allergy, as regards the number of relapses in patients in group B.

摘要

结论

患有鼻息肉且接受内镜手术的患者复发似乎是一个显著特征。无论采用何种手术技术,手术治疗均显著提高了所有患者的生活质量。我们的结果表明,与接受中鼻甲保守手术的患者(A组)相比,接受更激进手术的患者(B组)对鼻腔病变复发的控制更好。B组中的过敏患者在随访期间的复发次数少于A组中的过敏患者,且具有统计学意义。

目的

不同的内镜手术技术已应用于鼻息肉的治疗。在筛窦切除术中,一些作者倾向于切除中鼻甲,而另一些作者则保留该结构。迄今为止,尚无研究在仅因鼻息肉接受手术的同质病例系列中,比较中鼻甲被切除和中鼻甲被保留的患者的结果。我们研究的目的是比较这两组患者的结果。

患者与方法

进行了一项前瞻性研究。基于内镜检查对鼻息肉进行研究,并使用肯尼迪CT分期系统根据鼻窦CT对所有患者进行分类。在研究组中,仅招募在内镜评估中处于II - III期、肯尼迪评分为III - IV分、患有鼻息肉且对药物治疗无反应的患者。通过皮肤点刺试验结果评估过敏情况,通过肺功能检查评估哮喘情况。在3年的随访中评估复发率和生活质量。

结果

总共选择了56例患者,并在3年的随访期内对所有患者进行了观察。我们确定了两组:A组,34例(60.71%)患有鼻息肉的患者接受了保留中鼻甲的内镜手术;B组,22例(39.29%)患有鼻息肉的患者接受了更激进的鼻内镜鼻窦手术。分析整个研究组,在3年的随访期间,56例患者中有20例(35.71%)鼻息肉复发。分析过敏和非过敏患者复发时间曲线,我们得到的p值为0.0589,即处于统计学意义的临界值。整个研究组术前和术后科隆测试之间的比较在症状改善方面具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。还评估了两组内的趋势:B组患者与A组患者在复发时间上的行为存在统计学差异(p = 0.0102)。A组患者在随访期间更频繁地出现鼻腔复发。在A组中,过敏患者与非过敏患者之间存在统计学差异(p = 0.0074);过敏患者在随访期间更频繁地出现鼻腔复发。在B组患者中,我们未发现过敏患者与非过敏患者在复发次数方面存在统计学差异。

相似文献

1
Middle turbinate preservation versus middle turbinate resection in endoscopic surgical treatment of nasal polyposis.鼻息肉内镜手术治疗中保留中鼻甲与切除中鼻甲的对比
Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 Sep;128(9):1019-26. doi: 10.1080/00016480701827541.
2
Partial middle turbinectomy during endoscopic sinus surgery for extended sinonasal polyposis: short- and mid-term outcomes.内镜鼻窦手术治疗广泛性鼻息肉病时行部分中鼻甲切除术:短期和中期疗效
Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 Jan;128(1):73-7. doi: 10.1080/00016480701361947.
3
[Possibility and clinical significance of reservation middle turbinate in endoscopic sinus surgery].[鼻内镜鼻窦手术中保留中鼻甲的可行性及临床意义]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Feb;34(1):30-2.
4
Middle turbinate medialization and preservation in endoscopic sinus surgery.鼻内镜鼻窦手术中中鼻甲内移与保留
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Jul;123(1 Pt 1):76-80. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.105921.
5
Olfaction in patients with nasal polyposis: effects of systemic steroids and radical ethmoidectomy with middle turbinate resection (nasalization).鼻息肉患者的嗅觉:全身用类固醇及伴中鼻甲切除术(鼻腔化)的根治性筛窦切除术的影响
Rhinology. 2003 Dec;41(4):220-30.
6
Endoscopic view of middle turbinate polyps.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2000 May;79(5):344-6.
7
Endoscopic view of an anterior middle turbinate polyp.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2001 Jul;80(7):432-4.
8
Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency turbinoplasty and traditional surgical technique in treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy.射频鼻甲成形术与传统手术技术治疗下鼻甲肥大的有效性和安全性比较。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Dec;133(6):972-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.006.
9
[Different treatments of the middle turbinate and maxillary sinus in endoscopic sinus surgery and the curative effect].[鼻内镜手术中中鼻甲与上颌窦的不同处理方式及疗效]
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2004 Sep;24(9):1082-3.
10
Middle turbinate resection versus preservation in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis accompanying nasal polyposis: baseline disease burden and surgical outcomes between the groups.中鼻甲切除术与保留术在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者中的比较:两组基线疾病负担和手术结局。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Aug;41(4):259-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Partial Middle Turbinate Resection Versus Preservation on Olfactory Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.部分中鼻甲切除术与保留术对嗅觉功能的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251351566. doi: 10.1177/19160216251351566. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
Middle Turbinate Resection Versus its Preservation in Patients with Chronic Polypoid Rhinosinusitis Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.慢性息肉样鼻窦炎患者行鼻内镜鼻窦手术时中鼻甲切除术与中鼻甲保留术的对比
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Mar;77(3):1209-1214. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-05188-4. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
3
Prognostic Value of Polypoid Changes of the Middle Turbinate in Relapsed Nasal Polypi after FESS: A Prospective Cohort Study.
功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术后复发性鼻息肉中鼻甲息肉样变的预后价值:一项前瞻性队列研究
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Nov 29;28(2):e226-e233. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776730. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Medial flap middle turbinoplasty for solid middle turbinate hypertrophy: improving airway, speeding healing and preserving olfaction.鼻甲成形术治疗鼻中隔实质性肥大的中鼻甲外侧壁带蒂黏膜瓣:改善气道,加速愈合,保留嗅觉。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):805-816. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08264-7. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
5
technique for resection of selected pituitary adenomas.特定垂体腺瘤切除术技术
Brain Spine. 2023 Feb 25;3:101724. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101724. eCollection 2023.
6
Maximizing Postoperative Recovery: The Role of Functional Biomaterials as Nasal Packs-A Comprehensive Systematic Review without Meta-Analysis (SWiM).优化术后恢复:功能性生物材料作为鼻腔填塞物的作用——一项无Meta分析的全面系统评价(SWiM)
Pharmaceutics. 2023 May 18;15(5):1534. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15051534.
7
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery of Nasal Polyposis: The Vexing Question of Whether to Resect or Preserve Middle Turbinate.鼻息肉的功能性内镜鼻窦手术:保留还是切除中鼻甲这一棘手问题
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov;71(Suppl 3):2025-2030. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1450-0. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
8
Resection versus preservation of the middle turbinate in surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a randomized controlled trial.中鼻甲切除术与保留术在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者手术中的对比:一项随机对照试验。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov 8;47(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40463-018-0313-8.
9
Endoscopic unilateral transethmoid-paraseptal approach to the central skull base.内镜下单侧经筛窦-鼻中隔旁入路至中央颅底
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2017 May 28;2(5):281-287. doi: 10.1002/lio2.82. eCollection 2017 Oct.
10
The status of the middle turbinate and the risk of sinusitis after endoscopic transnasal sphenoidotomy.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar;274(3):1495-1499. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4370-1. Epub 2016 Nov 10.