• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决定是否就医疗保健问题与公众互动。

Deciding whether to engage the public on health care issues.

作者信息

Chafe Roger, Neville Doreen, Rathwell Thomas, Deber Raisa

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Healthc Manage Forum. 2008 Autumn;21(3):24-8. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60271-2.

DOI:10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60271-2
PMID:19086482
Abstract

Health care decision-makers often face calls for greater public participation or see increasing public engagement as part of their organizational mandate. This article identifies six questions decision-makers must consider when deciding whether to formally engage the public or other stakeholders around a particular health care issue. These questions focus on (1) the clarity of the issue for public engagement, (2) the appropriateness of the issue for public engagement, (3) the extent to which there are viable options, (4) the role for the public, (5) whether the public likely want to be involved and (6) consideration of the expected advantages and disadvantages of public engagement.

摘要

医疗保健决策者常常面临要求加大公众参与度的呼声,或者将日益增加的公众参与视为其组织使命的一部分。本文确定了决策者在决定是否就某一特定医疗保健问题正式让公众或其他利益相关者参与时必须考虑的六个问题。这些问题集中于:(1)公众参与问题的清晰度;(2)公众参与问题的适当性;(3)存在可行选项的程度;(4)公众的作用;(5)公众是否可能愿意参与;以及(6)对公众参与预期利弊的考量。

相似文献

1
Deciding whether to engage the public on health care issues.决定是否就医疗保健问题与公众互动。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2008 Autumn;21(3):24-8. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60271-2.
2
Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.影响学术教师与决策者参与的因素:公共卫生学院的经验教训和优先事项。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0342-9.
3
Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy.解决癌症药物可负担性问题:利用审议式公众参与为卫生政策提供信息。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Feb 7;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0411-8.
4
Citizen participation in health decision-making: past experience and future prospects.公民参与健康决策:过去的经验与未来的前景
J Public Health Policy. 2002;23(1):12-32.
5
Reluctant rationers: public input to health care priorities.不情愿的分配者:公众对医疗保健优先事项的投入。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Apr;2(2):103-11. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200208.
6
Public perspectives on disinvestments in drug funding: results from a Canadian deliberative public engagement event on cancer drugs.公众对药物投资减少的看法:加拿大癌症药物协商式公众参与活动的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):977. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7303-2.
7
A framework for involving the public in health care coverage and resource allocation decisions.让公众参与医疗保健覆盖范围和资源分配决策的框架。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2008 Winter;21(4):6-21. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60050-6.
8
[Open prioritization in health care is necessary for confidence in the welfare model. A gap between citizens', decision makers' and health personnel's values].[医疗保健中的开放优先级设定对于福利模式的可信度至关重要。公民、决策者和卫生人员价值观之间的差距]
Lakartidningen. 2003 Jan 30;100(5):310-2, 315-6.
9
Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.哪些公众以及为何是刻意选择的?——对公共卫生与卫生政策研究中公众参与审议的范围界定审查
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
10
A vision of the health decisions movement.健康决策运动的愿景。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Sep-Oct;20(5):21-2.

引用本文的文献

1
'Practical' resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review.支持患者及家属参与医疗决策的“实用”资源:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 15;14:175. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-175.