Forgays Deborah Kirby
Department of Psychology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225-9089, USA.
Adolescence. 2008 Fall;43(171):473-84.
Since 1983, Teen Courts have offered ajudicial alternative for many adolescent offenders. In the first year of the Whatcom County Teen Court Program, a small sample of Teen Court offenders had more favorable outcomes than did Court Diversion offenders. In the current study, the results are based on a three-year sample of 84 Whatcom County adjudicated youths, each with at least one prior conviction. Overall, recidivism was lower for the Teen Court offenders than for first-time Court Diversion offenders. Sentence completion rates were comparable for the two groups. In addition to behavioral outcomes, responses on a satisfaction survey and a self-acceptance inventory provide a more complete view of the offenders' perspectives. One unanticipated outcome was the number of offenders who chose to continue involvement with Teen Court sessions, independent of sentencing requirements.
自1983年以来,青少年法庭为许多青少年罪犯提供了一种司法替代方案。在霍特科姆县青少年法庭项目的第一年,一小部分青少年法庭罪犯比法庭分流项目的罪犯有更有利的结果。在当前的研究中,结果基于对霍特科姆县84名被判定有罪的青少年进行的为期三年的抽样调查,每名青少年至少有一次前科。总体而言,青少年法庭罪犯的再犯率低于首次参加法庭分流项目的罪犯。两组的判决完成率相当。除了行为结果外,满意度调查和自我接纳量表的反馈提供了对罪犯观点更全面的看法。一个意外的结果是,有相当数量的罪犯选择继续参与青少年法庭的庭审,而不受量刑要求的限制。