• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由同龄人组成的陪审团:青少年法庭对刑事累犯影响的荟萃分析。

A Jury of Their Peers: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Teen Court on Criminal Recidivism.

作者信息

Bouchard Jessica, Wong Jennifer S

机构信息

Jessica Bouchard School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Jul;46(7):1472-1487. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0667-7. Epub 2017 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-017-0667-7
PMID:28365901
Abstract

Juvenile delinquency has been on the decline for a number of years, yet, juvenile courts continue to assess more than 1 million cases per year. Involvement with the juvenile justice system has been linked to a number of risk factors and consequences that may impact positive youth development; however, evidence-based correctional programs that divert juvenile offenders away from formal processing are limited. Teen Court is a specialized diversion intervention that offers an alternative to traditional court processing for juvenile offenders. Despite the rapid expansion of Teen Courts, there is little comprehensive and systematic evidence available to justify this expansion. This meta-analytic study examines the effects of Teen Court on the recidivism of juvenile offenders. The literature search resulted in the selection of 14 studies, which contributed 18 unique effect sizes with a total sample of 2125 treatment group and 979 comparison group youth. The findings suggest that Teen Court is no more effective at reducing recidivism than (a) formal processing or (b) other diversion programs. Implications of formal and informal court processing for low-risk, first-time young offenders are discussed. The authors draw on the Risk-Need-Responsivity model to provide recommendations for policies and practices.

摘要

青少年犯罪率多年来一直在下降,然而,少年法庭每年仍要审理超过100万起案件。与少年司法系统的接触与一些可能影响青少年积极发展的风险因素和后果有关;然而,能使少年罪犯避免正式程序的循证矫正项目却很有限。青少年法庭是一种专门的分流干预措施,为少年罪犯提供了一种替代传统法庭程序的选择。尽管青少年法庭迅速扩张,但几乎没有全面系统的证据来证明这种扩张的合理性。这项荟萃分析研究考察了青少年法庭对少年罪犯再犯率的影响。文献检索结果筛选出14项研究,这些研究提供了18个独立的效应量,治疗组共有2125名青少年,对照组有979名青少年。研究结果表明,青少年法庭在降低再犯率方面并不比(a)正式程序或(b)其他分流项目更有效。讨论了正式和非正式法庭程序对低风险、初犯的年轻罪犯的影响。作者借鉴风险-需求-反应性模型为政策和实践提供建议。

相似文献

1
A Jury of Their Peers: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Teen Court on Criminal Recidivism.由同龄人组成的陪审团:青少年法庭对刑事累犯影响的荟萃分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Jul;46(7):1472-1487. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0667-7. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
2
IsTeen Court effective for repeat offenders? A test of the restorative justice approach.青少年法庭对惯犯有效吗?恢复性司法方法的一项测试。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2005 Feb;49(1):107-18. doi: 10.1177/0306624X04269411.
3
Police-initiated diversion for youth to prevent future delinquent behavior: a systematic review.警方发起的青少年分流措施以预防未来的犯罪行为:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-88. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.5. eCollection 2018.
4
Differences between juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disabilities in the importance of static and dynamic risk factors for recidivism.有智力障碍和无智力障碍的青少年罪犯在累犯的静态和动态风险因素重要性方面的差异。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Nov;58(11):992-1003. doi: 10.1111/jir.12078. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
5
The Impact of Teen Court on Rural Adolescents: Improved Social Relationships, Psychological Functioning, and School Experiences.青少年法庭对农村青少年的影响:改善社会关系、心理功能和学校体验。
J Prim Prev. 2017 Aug;38(4):447-464. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0470-y.
6
A teen court evaluation with a therapeutic jurisprudence perspective.从治疗法学视角进行的青少年法庭评估。
Behav Sci Law. 2002;20(4):381-92. doi: 10.1002/bsl.499.
7
The Impact of Two Los Angeles County Teen Courts on Youth Recidivism: Comparing Two Informal Probation Programs.洛杉矶县两个青少年法庭对青少年累犯的影响:比较两种非正式缓刑计划。
J Exp Criminol. 2016 Mar;12(1):105-126. doi: 10.1007/s11292-016-9255-1.
8
Three years of Teen Court offender outcomes.青少年法庭罪犯三年的判决结果。
Adolescence. 2008 Fall;43(171):473-84.
9
Restorative Justice Conferencing: Not a Panacea for the Overrepresentation of Australia's Indigenous Youth in the Criminal Justice System.恢复性司法会议:并非解决澳大利亚原住民青年在刑事司法系统中占比过高问题的万灵药。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Oct;62(13):4067-4090. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18764524. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
10
A meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programs for juvenile offenders.少年犯转移项目的实验研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Feb;32(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding treatment pathways for sexually abusive behaviour in young people: an examination of Therapeutic Treatment Orders.拓展针对青少年性虐待行为的治疗途径:对治疗令的审视
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Jan 8;31(6):1029-1050. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2243303. eCollection 2024.
2
The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders.40年的争论:关于对少年犯有效的方法的元综述。
J Exp Criminol. 2023;19(1):1-30. doi: 10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
3
Testing an evidence-based drug abuse and violence preventive approach adapted for youth in juvenile justice diversionary settings.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the Effects of Intensive Supervision and Aftercare Programs for At-Risk Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.审视针对高危青少年的强化监管及后续照护项目的效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 May;62(6):1509-1534. doi: 10.1177/0306624X17690449. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
2
The Impact of Two Los Angeles County Teen Courts on Youth Recidivism: Comparing Two Informal Probation Programs.洛杉矶县两个青少年法庭对青少年累犯的影响:比较两种非正式缓刑计划。
J Exp Criminol. 2016 Mar;12(1):105-126. doi: 10.1007/s11292-016-9255-1.
3
Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters.
在青少年司法转处环境中,测试一种为青少年改编的循证药物滥用和暴力预防方法。
Health Justice. 2021 Feb 2;9(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00128-8.
随机效应荟萃分析:研究数量至关重要。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Jun;26(3):1500-1518. doi: 10.1177/0962280215583568. Epub 2015 May 7.
4
A meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programs for juvenile offenders.少年犯转移项目的实验研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Feb;32(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
5
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验荟萃分析中检查和解释漏斗图不对称性的建议。
BMJ. 2011 Jul 22;343:d4002. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4002.
6
Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice.青少年司法的医源性效应。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;50(8):991-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02057.x.
7
Functional impairment in youth three years after detention.被拘留三年后青少年的功能损害。
J Adolesc Health. 2009 Jun;44(6):528-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.10.005. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
8
Three years of Teen Court offender outcomes.青少年法庭罪犯三年的判决结果。
Adolescence. 2008 Fall;43(171):473-84.
9
Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: a meta-analytic investigation.矫正治疗中病例分类的风险原则:一项元分析调查。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006 Feb;50(1):88-100. doi: 10.1177/0306624X05282556.
10
Prevalence of mental illness and substance abuse disorders among incarcerated juvenile offenders in Mississippi.密西西比州被监禁少年犯中精神疾病和药物滥用障碍的患病率。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2004 Fall;35(1):55-74. doi: 10.1023/b:chud.0000039320.40382.91.