Sellbom Martin, Bagby R Michael
Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2008 Dec;20(4):370-6. doi: 10.1037/a0012952.
In the current investigation, the authors examined the validity of the L-r and K-r scales on the recently developed Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF; Y. S. Ben-Porath & A. Tellegen, in press) in measuring underreported response bias. Three archival samples previously collected for examining MMPI-2 validity scales were reanalyzed in 2 studies. In Study 1 L-r and K-r significantly differentiated 2 groups of participants (patients with schizophrenia and university students) who had been instructed to underreport on the MMPI-2 from participants who took the test under standard instructions. L-r and K-r also added incremental predictive variance to one another in differentiating these groups. In Study 2 a similar set of outcomes emerged through the use of a differential prevalence design in which L-r and K-r significantly differentiated a group of child custody litigants who were administered the MMPI-2 from university students taking the test under standard instructions.
在当前的调查中,作者检验了最近编制的明尼苏达多相人格问卷第二版修订版(MMPI-2-RF;Y. S. 本-波拉特和A. 泰勒根,即将出版)中L-r和K-r量表在测量低报反应偏差方面的有效性。在两项研究中,对之前为检验MMPI-2效度量表而收集的三个档案样本进行了重新分析。在研究1中,L-r和K-r显著区分了两组参与者(精神分裂症患者和大学生),这两组参与者被指示在MMPI-2上低报,而另一组参与者是按照标准指导语进行测试的。在区分这些组时,L-r和K-r彼此之间也增加了增量预测方差。在研究2中,通过使用差异患病率设计出现了类似的一组结果,其中L-r和K-r显著区分了一组接受MMPI-2测试的儿童监护权诉讼当事人和按照标准指导语进行测试的大学生。