Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0348, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2010 Dec;22(4):757-67. doi: 10.1037/a0020825.
We examined the utility of the validity scales on the recently released Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2 RF; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008) to detect overreported psychopathology. This set of validity scales includes a newly developed scale and revised versions of the original MMPI-2 validity scales. We used an analogue, experimental simulation in which MMPI-2 RF responses (derived from archived MMPI-2 protocols) of undergraduate students instructed to overreport psychopathology (in either a coached or noncoached condition) were compared with those of psychiatric inpatients who completed the MMPI-2 under standardized instructions. The MMPI-2 RF validity scale Infrequent Psychopathology Responses best differentiated the simulation groups from the sample of patients, regardless of experimental condition. No other validity scale added consistent incremental predictive utility to Infrequent Psychopathology Responses in distinguishing the simulation groups from the sample of patients. Classification accuracy statistics confirmed the recommended cut scores in the MMPI-2 RF manual (Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008).
我们考察了最近发布的明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版修订本(MMPI-2 RF;Ben-Porath & Tellegen,2008)中的效度量表在检测夸大的精神病理学方面的效用。这组效度量表包括一个新开发的量表和原始 MMPI-2 效度量表的修订版本。我们使用了一个模拟实验,其中要求大学生在指导下夸大精神病理学(在有指导或无指导的条件下),并将他们的 MMPI-2 RF 反应(源自存档的 MMPI-2 协议)与按照标准指示完成 MMPI-2 的住院精神病人进行比较。无论实验条件如何,MMPI-2 RF 效度量表“少见的精神病理学反应”都能最好地区分模拟组和病人样本。没有其他效度量表在区分模拟组和病人样本方面增加了对“少见的精神病理学反应”的一致增量预测效用。分类准确性统计数据证实了 MMPI-2 RF 手册(Ben-Porath & Tellegen,2008)中推荐的切割分数。