English W A, Tully R, Muller G D, Eltringham R J J
Department of Anaesthesia, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital NHS Trust, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL13NN, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jan;64(1):84-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05739.x.
The Diamedica Draw-Over Vaporizer (DDV) has been developed as an alternative to the Oxford Miniature Vaporizer (OMV). Both can function as draw-over or plenum vaporizers. The performances of these two vaporizers were compared under conditions simulating intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) and continuous flow (CF). Series 1 experiments were conducted with the vaporizers in water baths at 20, 25 and 30 degrees C. Vaporizers were tested at dial settings of 1-4% over a range of minute volumes (1.75-6 l.min(-1)) and flow rates (3-8 l.min(-1)). Series 2 experiments compared output of the vaporizers over time at ambient temperatures of 20, 25 and 30 degrees C. A minute volume of 6 l.min(-1) (IPPV) and a gas flow of 8 l.min(-1) (CF) were used with a vaporizer setting of 2%. Vapour concentrations were recorded at 5-min intervals. In series 1 IPPV experiments, the DDV vaporizer was more accurate, producing significantly fewer vapour concentrations 0.5% more than or less than setting (p = 0.013). The OMV tended to produce more favourable results under continuous flow (p = 0.42). In series 2 experiments, the accuracy of both vaporizers was similar but consistency of output over time was better for the DDV and consistency of output according to differences in ambient temperature was better for the DDV. The OMV produced more vapour concentrations that were markedly higher than dial setting, particularly at high ambient temperatures. The DDV is a suitable alternative to the OMV with some distinct advantages. These include a larger reservoir, tendency towards greater accuracy during IPPV and improved consistency of output.
Diamedica 抽吸式蒸发器(DDV)是作为牛津微型蒸发器(OMV)的替代品而研发的。两者都可作为抽吸式或增压式蒸发器使用。在模拟间歇正压通气(IPPV)和持续气流(CF)的条件下,对这两种蒸发器的性能进行了比较。系列1实验是在20、25和30摄氏度的水浴中对蒸发器进行的。在一系列分钟通气量(1.75 - 6 l.min⁻¹)和流速(3 - 8 l.min⁻¹)下,对蒸发器进行了1 - 4%刻度设置的测试。系列2实验比较了在20、25和30摄氏度环境温度下,蒸发器随时间的输出情况。使用6 l.min⁻¹的分钟通气量(IPPV)和8 l.min⁻¹的气流(CF),蒸发器设置为2%。每隔5分钟记录一次蒸汽浓度。在系列1的IPPV实验中,DDV蒸发器更精确,产生的蒸汽浓度比设置值高或低0.5%以上的情况明显更少(p = 0.013)。在持续气流条件下,OMV往往产生更有利的结果(p = 0.42)。在系列2实验中,两种蒸发器的精度相似,但DDV随时间的输出一致性更好,并且根据环境温度差异的输出一致性也更好。OMV产生的蒸汽浓度明显高于刻度设置,特别是在高环境温度下。DDV是OMV的合适替代品,具有一些明显优势。这些优势包括更大的储液器、在IPPV期间更精确的趋势以及输出一致性的提高。