同行评议的悲剧。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

The tragedy of the reviewer commons.

作者信息

Hochberg Michael E, Chase Jonathan M, Gotelli Nicholas J, Hastings Alan, Naeem Shahid

出版信息

Ecol Lett. 2009 Jan;12(1):2-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01276.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01276.x

PMID:19087107

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

The tragedy of the reviewer commons.

Ecol Lett. 2009 Jan;12(1):2-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01276.x.

Change to Open Peer Commentary format.

Phys Life Rev. 2010 Mar;7(1):1. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 28.

Editor's report.

Nucl Med Commun. 2008 Jan;29(1):1-3. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f4758e.

On editorial practice and peer review.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(4):699-701. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00800.x.

Rebooting review.

Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Apr;33(4):319. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3202.

Pediatric Research--the evolution continues.

Pediatr Res. 2009 Jul;66(1):1. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181aebf2b.

Experimenting with peer review.

ACS Chem Biol. 2006 Jul 21;1(6):325-6. doi: 10.1021/cb6002866.

Peer review and fraud.

Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):971-2. doi: 10.1038/444971b.

Journal lays bare remarks from peer reviewers.

Nature. 2006 Feb 9;439(7077):642. doi: 10.1038/439642b.

["Invisible hand of a reviewer"--peer review of papers in "Morfologia" journal. Current practice and perspectives].

Morfologiia. 2002;122(6):7-9.

引用本文的文献

Decentralized knowledge assessment.

Innovation (Camb). 2025 May 9;6(6):100945. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100945. eCollection 2025 Jun 2.

On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective.

PLoS Biol. 2019 Feb 21;17(2):e3000151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000151. eCollection 2019 Feb.

The effectiveness of journals as arbiters of scientific impact.

Ecol Evol. 2018 Sep 12;8(19):9566-9585. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4467. eCollection 2018 Oct.

Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution.

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Mar 8;2:3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0027-x. eCollection 2017.

Editorial behaviors in peer review.

Springerplus. 2016 Jun 27;5(1):903. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2601-y. eCollection 2016.

Principles of cooperation across systems: from human sharing to multicellularity and cancer.

Evol Appl. 2015 Oct 17;9(1):17-36. doi: 10.1111/eva.12303. eCollection 2016 Jan.

How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals.

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0132557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132557. eCollection 2015.

The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers.

R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Feb 11;2(2):140540. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140540. eCollection 2015 Feb.

Imbalance in individual researcher's peer review activities quantified for four British Ecological Society journals, 2003-2010.

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092896. eCollection 2014.

The case for open preprints in biology.

PLoS Biol. 2013;11(5):e1001563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001563. Epub 2013 May 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

The tragedy of the reviewer commons.

Ecol Lett. 2009 Jan;12(1):2-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01276.x.

Change to Open Peer Commentary format.

Phys Life Rev. 2010 Mar;7(1):1. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 28.

Editor's report.

Nucl Med Commun. 2008 Jan;29(1):1-3. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f4758e.

On editorial practice and peer review.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(4):699-701. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00800.x.

Rebooting review.

Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Apr;33(4):319. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3202.

Pediatric Research--the evolution continues.

Pediatr Res. 2009 Jul;66(1):1. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181aebf2b.

Experimenting with peer review.

ACS Chem Biol. 2006 Jul 21;1(6):325-6. doi: 10.1021/cb6002866.

Peer review and fraud.

Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):971-2. doi: 10.1038/444971b.

Journal lays bare remarks from peer reviewers.

Nature. 2006 Feb 9;439(7077):642. doi: 10.1038/439642b.

["Invisible hand of a reviewer"--peer review of papers in "Morfologia" journal. Current practice and perspectives].

Morfologiia. 2002;122(6):7-9.

引用本文的文献

Decentralized knowledge assessment.

Innovation (Camb). 2025 May 9;6(6):100945. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100945. eCollection 2025 Jun 2.

On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective.

PLoS Biol. 2019 Feb 21;17(2):e3000151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000151. eCollection 2019 Feb.

The effectiveness of journals as arbiters of scientific impact.

Ecol Evol. 2018 Sep 12;8(19):9566-9585. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4467. eCollection 2018 Oct.

Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution.

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Mar 8;2:3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0027-x. eCollection 2017.

Editorial behaviors in peer review.

Springerplus. 2016 Jun 27;5(1):903. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2601-y. eCollection 2016.

Principles of cooperation across systems: from human sharing to multicellularity and cancer.

Evol Appl. 2015 Oct 17;9(1):17-36. doi: 10.1111/eva.12303. eCollection 2016 Jan.

How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals.

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0132557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132557. eCollection 2015.

The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers.

R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Feb 11;2(2):140540. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140540. eCollection 2015 Feb.

Imbalance in individual researcher's peer review activities quantified for four British Ecological Society journals, 2003-2010.

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092896. eCollection 2014.

The case for open preprints in biology.

PLoS Biol. 2013;11(5):e1001563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001563. Epub 2013 May 14.