Li Zhongmin, Kravitz Richard L, Marcin James P, Romano Patrick S, Rocke David M, Denton Timothy A, Brindis Ralph G, Dai Jian, Amsterdam Ezra A
Division of General Internal Medicine and Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 16;8:257. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-257.
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is performed because of anticipated survival benefit, improvement in quality of life, or both. We performed this study to explore variations in clinical indications for CABG surgery among California hospitals and surgeons.
Using California CABG Outcomes Reporting Program data, we classified all isolated CABG cases in 2003-2004 as having "probable survival enhancing indications (SEIs)", "possible SEIs" or "non-SEIs." Patient and hospital characteristics associated with SEIs were examined.
While 82.9% of CABG were performed for probable SEIs, the range extended from 68% to 96% among hospitals and 51% to 100% among surgeons. SEI rates were higher among patients aged >or= 65 compared with those aged 18-64 (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] > 1.29 for age groups 65-69, 70-74 and >or= 75; all p < 0.001), among Asians and Native Americans compared with Caucasians (AOR 1.22 and 1.15, p < 0.001); and among patients with hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease and congestive heart failure compared to patients without these conditions (AOR > 1.09, all p < 0.001). Variations in indications for surgery were more strongly related to patient mix than to surgeon or hospital effects (intraclass correlation [ICC] = 0.04 for hospital; ICC = 0.01 for surgeon).
California hospitals and surgeons vary in their distribution of indications for CABG surgery. Further research is required to identify the roles of market factors, referral patterns, patient preferences, and local clinical culture in producing the observed variations.
冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是出于预期的生存获益、生活质量改善或两者兼而有之而进行的。我们开展这项研究以探究加利福尼亚州各医院和外科医生在CABG手术临床指征方面的差异。
利用加利福尼亚州CABG结果报告项目的数据,我们将2003 - 2004年所有单纯CABG病例分类为具有“可能的生存获益指征(SEIs)”、“可能的SEIs”或“非SEIs”。对与SEIs相关的患者和医院特征进行了检查。
虽然82.9%的CABG手术是出于可能的SEIs进行的,但各医院之间的比例范围为68%至96%,各外科医生之间的比例范围为51%至100%。与18 - 64岁患者相比,年龄≥65岁的患者SEI率更高(65 - 69岁、70 - 74岁和≥75岁年龄组的调整优势比[AOR]>1.29;所有p<0.001),亚裔和美洲原住民与白种人相比(AOR分别为1.22和1.15,p<0.001);与无这些疾病的患者相比,患有高血压、外周血管疾病、糖尿病、脑血管疾病和充血性心力衰竭的患者(AOR>1.09,所有p<0.001)。手术指征的差异与患者构成的关系比与外科医生或医院效应的关系更强(医院的组内相关系数[ICC] = 0.04;外科医生的ICC = 0.01)。
加利福尼亚州各医院和外科医生在CABG手术指征的分布上存在差异。需要进一步研究以确定市场因素、转诊模式、患者偏好和当地临床文化在产生所观察到的差异中所起的作用。