Fox G A, O'Dea J, Parfrey P S
Patient Research Center, General Hospital, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Nfld.
CMAJ. 1998 May 5;158(9):1137-42.
Newfoundland and Labrador, like other health care jurisdictions, is faced with widening gaps between the demands for health care and a strained ability to supply the necessary resources. The authors carried out a study to determine the rates of appropriate and inappropriate coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the province and the waiting times for this surgery.
This retrospective cohort study was performed in the tertiary care hospital that receives all referrals for coronary angiography and coronary artery revascularization for Newfoundland and Labrador. By reviewing the hospital records, the authors identified 2 groups of patients: those in whom critical coronary artery disease was diagnosed on the basis of coronary angiography and who were referred for CABG between Apr. 1, 1994, and Mar. 31, 1995, and those who actually underwent the procedure during that period. By applying specific criteria developed by the RAND Corporation, the authors determined the appropriateness and necessity of CABG in each case. They also compared waiting times for CABG with optimal waiting times; as determined by a consensus-based priority score.
A total of 338 patients underwent CABG during the study period. The cases were characterized by multivessel disease and late-stage angina symptoms. Almost all of the patients had high appropriateness scores (7-9), and nearly 95% had high necessity scores (7-9). However, during the study period, the waiting list increased by about 20%, because a total of 391 patients were referred by the weekly cardiovascular surgery conference; the authors identified these and an additional 31 patients as having necessity scores of 7 or more. Only 7 (23%) of 31 patients for whom CABG was considered very urgent underwent surgery within the recommended 24 hours, and only 30 (24%) of the 122 patients for whom CABG was considered urgent underwent surgery within the recommended 72 hours.
These results provide evidence that the cardiac surgery program in Newfoundland and Labrador is performing CABG in patients for whom surgical revascularization is highly appropriate and necessary. Access to CABG is less than ideal, however, since the waiting list continues to expand, and many patients wait beyond the recommended time for surgery.
与其他医疗辖区一样,纽芬兰和拉布拉多面临着医疗需求不断增加与资源供应紧张之间日益扩大的差距。作者开展了一项研究,以确定该省冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的合理与不合理手术率以及该手术的等待时间。
这项回顾性队列研究在一家三级护理医院进行,该医院接收纽芬兰和拉布拉多所有冠状动脉造影和冠状动脉血运重建的转诊患者。通过查阅医院记录,作者确定了两组患者:一组是在1994年4月1日至1995年3月31日期间根据冠状动脉造影诊断为严重冠状动脉疾病并被转诊进行CABG的患者,另一组是在此期间实际接受该手术的患者。作者应用兰德公司制定的特定标准,确定了每例CABG的合理性和必要性。他们还将CABG的等待时间与最佳等待时间进行了比较;最佳等待时间由基于共识的优先评分确定。
在研究期间,共有338例患者接受了CABG。这些病例的特点是多支血管病变和晚期心绞痛症状。几乎所有患者的合理性评分都很高(7 - 9分),近95%的患者必要性评分也很高(7 - 9分)。然而,在研究期间,等待名单增加了约20%,因为每周的心血管外科会议共转诊了391例患者;作者确定这些患者以及另外31例患者的必要性评分为7分或更高。在被认为非常紧急需要进行CABG的31例患者中,只有7例(23%)在建议的24小时内接受了手术,在被认为紧急需要进行CABG的122例患者中,只有30例(24%)在建议的72小时内接受了手术。
这些结果表明,纽芬兰和拉布拉多的心脏手术项目正在为那些手术血运重建非常合适且必要的患者进行CABG。然而,由于等待名单持续扩大,许多患者等待时间超过了建议的手术时间,CABG的可及性并不理想。