Gupta Digant, Grutsch James F, Lis Christopher G
Office of Research, Cancer Treatment Centers of America at Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL 60099, USA.
J Soc Integr Oncol. 2008 Summer;6(3):98-104.
Extensive data show that quality of life (QoL) tools measuring the activities of daily life provide prognostic information in cancer. Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index (QLI) is an instrument measuring patients' satisfaction with their life. This study evaluated the association between QLI and survival in ovarian cancer. We examined a consecutive case series of 90 patients with histologically confirmed stage I-IV ovarian cancer treated at Cancer Treatment Centers of America. QLI measures overall QoL and QoL in four major subscales: Health and Physical, Social and Economic, Psychological and Spiritual, and Family. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were then performed to evaluate the joint prognostic significance of QoL and clinical factors. The Health and Physical subscale was marginally statistically significant (p = .08) after controlling for stage at diagnosis, prior treatment history, and other QLI subscales. Our study has demonstrated no statistically significant prognostic association of patient satisfaction with QoL, as measured by the QLI, with survival in ovarian cancer.
大量数据表明,用于衡量日常生活活动的生活质量(QoL)工具可为癌症提供预后信息。费兰斯和鲍尔斯生活质量指数(QLI)是一种衡量患者对其生活满意度的工具。本研究评估了QLI与卵巢癌生存率之间的关联。我们对在美国癌症治疗中心接受治疗的90例经组织学确诊为I-IV期卵巢癌的连续病例系列进行了研究。QLI测量总体生活质量以及四个主要子量表的生活质量:健康与身体、社会与经济、心理与精神以及家庭。采用Kaplan-Meier方法计算生存率。然后进行多变量Cox回归分析,以评估生活质量和临床因素的联合预后意义。在控制诊断分期、既往治疗史和其他QLI子量表后,健康与身体子量表具有边缘统计学意义(p = 0.08)。我们的研究表明,通过QLI测量的患者生活质量满意度与卵巢癌生存率之间不存在统计学上显著的预后关联。