Suppr超能文献

老年双相情感障碍;年龄和发病年龄的不同影响。

Bipolar disorder in the elderly; different effects of age and of age of onset.

作者信息

Oostervink Frits, Boomsma Maarten M, Nolen Willem A

机构信息

GGZ Haagstreek Department of Psychiatry, Leidschendam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2009 Aug;116(3):176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.11.012. Epub 2008 Dec 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information about differences between younger and elderly patients with bipolar disorder and between elderly patients with early and late age of onset of illness is limited.

METHOD

The European Mania in Bipolar Longitudinal Evaluation of Medication (EMBLEM) study was a 2-year prospective, observational study in 3459 bipolar patients on the treatment and outcome of patients with an acute manic or mixed episode. Within this study, elderly patients (>60 years of age; n=475) were compared with younger patients (<50 years of age; n=2286), and within the elderly group, Late Onset Bipolar (LOB) patients (onset > or =50 years; n=141) were compared with Early Onset Bipolar (EOB) patients (<50 years; n=323).

RESULTS

In the year prior to enrollment, elderly patients, especially those with EOB, more frequently reported a rapid cycling course of illness, but fewer suicide attempts. At baseline, elderly patients more often used one psychotropic medication and demonstrated less severe manic and psychotic symptoms, but no difference in depressive symptomatology. However, prior to enrollment and during the acute phase of treatment, elderly patients more frequently received antidepressants. Atypical antipsychotics were given less frequently. Regarding 12-week outcomes, there was no difference between elderly and younger patients, although LOB elderly recovered faster, and were discharged sooner than EOB elderly patients.

LIMITATIONS

Information about somatic conditions was not systematically collected nor was information about concurrent use of non-psychiatric medication which might have given some indication of somatic comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

Elderly bipolar manic patients differ from younger bipolar manic patients regarding treatment but not treatment outcome. LOB elderly patients demonstrated a more favourable outcome. The use of medication and the occurrence of rapid cycling in EOB elderly patients warrant further study.

摘要

背景

关于双相情感障碍年轻患者与老年患者之间以及老年患者早发和晚发疾病之间差异的信息有限。

方法

欧洲双相情感障碍药物纵向评估中的躁狂症(EMBLEM)研究是一项为期2年的前瞻性观察性研究,对3459例双相情感障碍患者进行急性躁狂或混合发作的治疗及转归研究。在本研究中,将老年患者(>60岁;n = 475)与年轻患者(<50岁;n = 2286)进行比较,并且在老年组中,将晚发性双相情感障碍(LOB)患者(发病年龄≥50岁;n = 141)与早发性双相情感障碍(EOB)患者(<50岁;n = 323)进行比较。

结果

在入组前一年,老年患者,尤其是EOB患者,更频繁地报告疾病快速循环病程,但自杀未遂次数较少。在基线时,老年患者更常使用一种精神药物,且躁狂和精神病性症状较轻,但抑郁症状无差异。然而,在入组前和治疗急性期,老年患者更频繁地接受抗抑郁药治疗。非典型抗精神病药物的使用频率较低。关于12周的转归,老年患者和年轻患者之间没有差异,尽管LOB老年患者恢复更快,且比EOB老年患者更早出院。

局限性

未系统收集躯体状况信息,也未收集关于非精神科药物同时使用的信息,而这些信息可能提示躯体共病情况。

结论

老年双相情感障碍躁狂患者在治疗方面与年轻双相情感障碍躁狂患者不同,但治疗转归无差异。LOB老年患者显示出更有利的转归。EOB老年患者的药物使用情况和快速循环的发生值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验