• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Correcting estimators of theta and Tajima's D for ascertainment biases caused by the single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery process.校正由单核苷酸多态性发现过程导致的确定偏差的θ和 Tajima's D估计量。
Genetics. 2009 Feb;181(2):701-10. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.094060. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
2
Correcting for ascertainment biases when analyzing SNP data: applications to the estimation of linkage disequilibrium.分析单核苷酸多态性(SNP)数据时校正确定偏倚:在连锁不平衡估计中的应用
Theor Popul Biol. 2003 May;63(3):245-55. doi: 10.1016/s0040-5809(03)00005-4.
3
Calculation of Tajima's D and other neutrality test statistics from low depth next-generation sequencing data.从低深度下一代测序数据中计算 Tajima's D 和其他中性检验统计量。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Oct 2;14:289. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-289.
4
Ascertainment bias and the pattern of nucleotide diversity at the human ALDH2 locus in a Japanese population.日本人群中人类ALDH2基因座的确认偏倚与核苷酸多样性模式
J Mol Evol. 2007 Mar;64(3):375-85. doi: 10.1007/s00239-006-0149-0. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
5
Estimating population divergence time and phylogeny from single-nucleotide polymorphisms data with outgroup ascertainment bias.基于外群确认偏倚的单核苷酸多态性数据估计群体分歧时间和系统发育。
Mol Ecol. 2012 Feb;21(4):974-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05413.x. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
6
Recombination and the properties of Tajima's D in the context of approximate-likelihood calculation.在近似似然计算背景下的重组与 Tajima's D 的性质
Genetics. 2005 Dec;171(4):2143-8. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.043786. Epub 2005 Jul 5.
7
Effects of single nucleotide polymorphism ascertainment on population structure inferences.单核苷酸多态性确定对群体结构推断的影响。
G3 (Bethesda). 2021 Sep 6;11(9). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab128.
8
How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias.基因芯片设计如何导致 SNP 确认偏倚。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 30;16(3):e0245178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245178. eCollection 2021.
9
Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphism.人类全基因组多态性研究中的确定偏倚。
Genome Res. 2005 Nov;15(11):1496-502. doi: 10.1101/gr.4107905.
10
Properties of bias and variance of two multiallelic estimators of F(ST).F(ST)的两种多等位基因估计量的偏差和方差特性。
Theor Popul Biol. 2000 May;57(3):285-96. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1457.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular marker development and genetic diversity exploration in .开发. 的分子标记和探索遗传多样性
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 16;11:e14698. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14698. eCollection 2023.
2
A Large Panel of Drosophila simulans Reveals an Abundance of Common Variants.大型黑腹果蝇模拟种群揭示了大量常见变异。
Genome Biol Evol. 2018 Jan 1;10(1):189-206. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx262.
3
Population genomics of the eastern cottonwood ().东部杨属植物()的群体基因组学
Ecol Evol. 2017 Oct 10;7(22):9426-9440. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3466. eCollection 2017 Nov.
4
Environmental versus geographical effects on genomic variation in wild soybean (Glycine soja) across its native range in northeast Asia.环境与地理因素对野生大豆(Glycine soja)在东北亚原生范围内基因组变异的影响
Ecol Evol. 2016 Aug 14;6(17):6332-44. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2351. eCollection 2016 Sep.
5
Inferring positive selection in humans from genomic data.从基因组数据推断人类的正选择。
Investig Genet. 2015 Apr 1;6:5. doi: 10.1186/s13323-015-0023-1. eCollection 2015.
6
A bioinformatics workflow for detecting signatures of selection in genomic data.一个用于在基因组数据中检测选择信号的生物信息学工作流程。
Front Genet. 2014 Aug 26;5:293. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00293. eCollection 2014.
7
Calculation of Tajima's D and other neutrality test statistics from low depth next-generation sequencing data.从低深度下一代测序数据中计算 Tajima's D 和其他中性检验统计量。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Oct 2;14:289. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-289.
8
Genetic diversity analysis of elite European maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines using AFLP, SSR, and SNP markers reveals ascertainment bias for a subset of SNPs.利用 AFLP、SSR 和 SNP 标记对欧洲玉米自交系进行遗传多样性分析,结果表明 SNP 子集存在选择偏倚。
Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Jan;126(1):133-41. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1968-6. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
9
Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes.人类外显子组深度测序中罕见编码变异的进化和功能影响。
Science. 2012 Jul 6;337(6090):64-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1219240. Epub 2012 May 17.
10
Rare variant density across the genome and across populations.全基因组及不同人群中的罕见变异密度。
BMC Proc. 2011 Nov 29;5 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S39. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S9-S39.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical power analysis of neutrality tests under demographic expansions, contractions and bottlenecks with recombination.在具有重组的人口扩张、收缩和瓶颈情况下,中性检验的统计功效分析。
Genetics. 2008 May;179(1):555-67. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.083006.
2
A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs.一张包含超过310万个单核苷酸多态性的第二代人类单倍型图谱。
Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):851-61. doi: 10.1038/nature06258.
3
Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia in Spanish kindred due to a large deletion in the ARH gene.
Mol Genet Metab. 2007 Nov;92(3):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
4
A new approach for using genome scans to detect recent positive selection in the human genome.一种利用基因组扫描检测人类基因组近期正选择的新方法。
PLoS Biol. 2007 Jul;5(7):e171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050171. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
5
Localizing recent adaptive evolution in the human genome.定位人类基因组中近期的适应性进化
PLoS Genet. 2007 Jun;3(6):e90. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030090. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
6
Positive natural selection in the human lineage.人类谱系中的正向自然选择。
Science. 2006 Jun 16;312(5780):1614-20. doi: 10.1126/science.1124309.
7
Direct detection of null alleles in SNP genotyping data.在单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因分型数据中直接检测无效等位基因。
Hum Mol Genet. 2006 Jun 15;15(12):1931-7. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl115. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
8
A fine-scale linkage-disequilibrium measure based on length of haplotype sharing.一种基于单倍型共享长度的精细尺度连锁不平衡度量。
Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Apr;78(4):615-28. doi: 10.1086/502632. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
9
A map of recent positive selection in the human genome.人类基因组中近期正选择图谱。
PLoS Biol. 2006 Mar;4(3):e72. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040072. Epub 2006 Mar 7.
10
Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data.使用单核苷酸多态性(SNP)数据进行选择性清除的基因组扫描。
Genome Res. 2005 Nov;15(11):1566-75. doi: 10.1101/gr.4252305.

校正由单核苷酸多态性发现过程导致的确定偏差的θ和 Tajima's D估计量。

Correcting estimators of theta and Tajima's D for ascertainment biases caused by the single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery process.

作者信息

Ramírez-Soriano Anna, Nielsen Rasmus

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Kbh Ø, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Genetics. 2009 Feb;181(2):701-10. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.094060. Epub 2008 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1534/genetics.108.094060
PMID:19087964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2644958/
Abstract

Most single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data suffer from an ascertainment bias caused by the process of SNP discovery followed by SNP genotyping. The final genotyped data are biased toward an excess of common alleles compared to directly sequenced data, making standard genetic methods of analysis inapplicable to this type of data. We here derive corrected estimators of the fundamental population genetic parameter = 4N(e)mu (N(e), effective population size; mu, mutation rate) on the basis of the average number of pairwise differences and on the basis of the number of segregating sites. We also derive the variances and covariances of these estimators and provide a corrected version of Tajima's D statistic. We reanalyze a human genomewide SNP data set and find substantial differences in the results with or without ascertainment bias correction.

摘要

大多数单核苷酸多态性(SNP)数据都存在由SNP发现过程随后,随后SNP基因分型所导致的确认偏倚。与直接测序数据相比,最终的基因分型数据偏向于常见等位基因过多,使得标准的遗传分析方法不适用于这类数据。我们在此基于成对差异的平均数和基于分离位点的数量,推导出基本群体遗传参数 = 4N(e)μ(N(e),有效群体大小;μ,突变率)的校正估计值。我们还推导了这些估计值的方差和协方差,并提供了Tajima's D统计量的校正版本。我们重新分析了一个人类全基因组SNP数据集,发现校正或未校正确认偏倚时结果存在显著差异。