Patel Tejas, Hirter Angie, Kaufman James, Keithi-Reddy Sai Ram, Reda Domenic, Singh Ajay
Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
Am J Nephrol. 2009;29(6):532-7. doi: 10.1159/000187649. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
Compared to the intravenous route, subcutaneous administration of epoetin requires lower dose and will be an attractive option for cost containment when bundling for dialysis is implemented. Hemoglobin variability defined as fluctuation of hemoglobin over time has not been well studied with respect to the route of administration.
157 prevalent-hemodialysis subjects were analyzed from an open-label, randomized study that compared the intravenous to the subcutaneous route of epoetin with identical weight-based dosing algorithm. Hemoglobin variability was defined as the number of weeks hemoglobin is outside the target range of 10-11 g/dl. Sensitivity analysis was performed.
78 subjects in the intravenous and 79 in the subcutaneous group entered the 24-week dose maintenance phase. Baseline covariates were similar in both groups except for the dose of epoetin (lower in subcutaneous) and dialysis vintage (longer in intravenous). Patients on subcutaneous epoetin were outside the target range more weeks (p = 0.04) and had higher standard deviation of hemoglobin (p = 0.01) compared to the intravenous group.
The subcutaneous route of epoetin was associated with modestly higher hemoglobin variability, probably reflecting greater sensitivity of the subcutaneous route and/or identical epoetin-dosing algorithm employed in both the arms. This study could serve as an important guide when bundling for dialysis services is implemented as switching from intravenous to subcutaneous administration is likely to occur.
与静脉途径相比,皮下注射促红细胞生成素所需剂量更低,在实施透析捆绑付费时,这将是控制成本的一个有吸引力的选择。关于给药途径,血红蛋白变异性(定义为血红蛋白随时间的波动)尚未得到充分研究。
从一项开放标签、随机研究中分析了157例维持性血液透析患者,该研究比较了静脉和皮下注射促红细胞生成素的相同体重给药算法。血红蛋白变异性定义为血红蛋白超出10 - 11 g/dl目标范围的周数。进行了敏感性分析。
78例静脉注射组和79例皮下注射组患者进入了24周的剂量维持阶段。除促红细胞生成素剂量(皮下注射组较低)和透析龄(静脉注射组较长)外,两组的基线协变量相似。与静脉注射组相比,皮下注射促红细胞生成素的患者超出目标范围的周数更多(p = 0.04),血红蛋白标准差更高(p = 0.01)。
促红细胞生成素皮下注射途径与血红蛋白变异性略高有关,这可能反映了皮下注射途径更高的敏感性和/或两组采用的相同促红细胞生成素给药算法。当实施透析服务捆绑付费时,本研究可作为重要指导,因为可能会从静脉注射改为皮下注射。