Suppr超能文献

血液透析患者促红细胞生成素(ESA)治疗从达贝泊汀-α转换为依泊汀-β:单中心经验

Switch of ESA therapy from darbepoetin-alpha to epoetin-beta in hemodialysis patients: a single-center experience.

作者信息

Biggar P, Ketteler M, Hennemann H, Dömling R

机构信息

Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Nephrol. 2008 Mar;69(3):185-92. doi: 10.5414/cnp69185.

Abstract

AIMS

No study has previously investigated a switch from darbepoetin-alpha to epoetin-beta in unselected dialysis patients. Our study determined the intravenous epoetin-beta dose necessary to maintain or to achieve hemoglobin targets after switching from darbepoetin-alpha.

METHODS

In our dialysis center, all eligible dialysis patients (n = 90) were switched from darbepoetin-alpha i.v. to epoetin-beta i.v. in 2005. The epoetin-beta dose was calculated according to the recommended European equimolar conversion factor (1 : 200 microg darbepoetin-alpha corresponds to 200 IU epoetin-beta. The intraindividual evaluation compared 12 weeks before with 16 weeks after the switch. The dose of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) and the hemoglobin levels were analyzed for the whole period and for the last 4 weeks of both treatment periods.

RESULTS

During treatment with darbepoetin-alpha, 71% of a total of 90 patients achieved a hemoglobin level > or = 11.0 g/dl. After switching to epoetin-beta, the mean hemoglobin level decreased significantly from 11.4 A+/- 1.0 g/dl to 11.1 A+/- 0.9 g/dl (p = 0.0016) and the percentage of patients with hemoglobin levels > or = 11.0 g/dl fell to 50% (p = 0.00138). Furthermore, the mean required ESA dose increased by 13% from 4,335 A+/- 3,217 IU/week darbepoetin-alpha to 4,885 A+/- 3,077 IU/week epoetin-beta (p = 0.0001). Comparing the last 4 weeks, the ESA dose increased by 17% from 4,583 A+/- 3,391 IU/week darbepoetin-alpha to 5,372 A+/- 3,672 IU/week epoetin-beta (p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

After switching from darbepoetin-alpha i.v. to epoetin-beta i.v., the equimolar epoetin-beta dose was not sufficient to maintain hemoglobin levels with the same efficacy above 11.0 g/dl. Significantly less patients achieved hemoglobin target values as suggested by the EBPG guidelines.

摘要

目的

此前尚无研究对未经过挑选的透析患者从α-达比波汀转换为β-促红细胞生成素进行调查。我们的研究确定了从α-达比波汀转换后维持或达到血红蛋白目标所需的静脉注射β-促红细胞生成素剂量。

方法

2005年,在我们的透析中心,所有符合条件的透析患者(n = 90)从静脉注射α-达比波汀转换为静脉注射β-促红细胞生成素。β-促红细胞生成素的剂量根据推荐的欧洲等摩尔转换系数计算(1:200微克α-达比波汀相当于200国际单位β-促红细胞生成素)。个体内评估比较了转换前12周和转换后16周的情况。分析了整个治疗期间以及两个治疗期最后4周的促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESA)剂量和血红蛋白水平。

结果

在使用α-达比波汀治疗期间,90例患者中有71%的血红蛋白水平达到或≥11.0克/分升。转换为β-促红细胞生成素后,平均血红蛋白水平从11.4±1.0克/分升显著降至11.1±0.9克/分升(p = 0.0016),血红蛋白水平达到或≥11.0克/分升的患者比例降至50%(p = 0.00138)。此外,平均所需的ESA剂量从α-达比波汀的4335±3217国际单位/周增加了13%,至β-促红细胞生成素的4885±3077国际单位/周(p = 0.0001)。比较最后4周,ESA剂量从α-达比波汀的4583±3391国际单位/周增加了17%,至β-促红细胞生成素的5372±3672国际单位/周(p = 0.0003)。

结论

从静脉注射α-达比波汀转换为静脉注射β-促红细胞生成素后,等摩尔的β-促红细胞生成素剂量不足以维持血红蛋白水平在11.0克/分升以上的相同疗效。达到欧洲最佳实践指南(EBPG)建议的血红蛋白目标值的患者明显减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验