Suppr超能文献

肌肉骨骼疾病中补充和替代医学的使用:医学怀疑主义重要吗?

Complementary and alternative medicine use in musculoskeletal disorders: does medical skepticism matter?

作者信息

Wiley-Exley Elizabeth K, Mielenz Thelma J, Norton Edward C, Callahan Leigh F

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Administration, University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Public Health, USA.

出版信息

Open Rheumatol J. 2007;1:5-11. doi: 10.2174/1874312900701010005. Epub 2007 Sep 18.

Abstract

Medical skepticism is the reservation about the ability of conventional medical care to significantly improve health. Individuals with musculoskeletal disorders seeing specialists usually experience higher levels of disability; therefore it is expected they might be more skeptical of current treatment and thus more likely to try Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM). The goal of this study was to define these relationships. These data were drawn from a cross-sectional survey from two cohorts: those seeing specialists (n=1,344) and non-specialists (n=724). Site-level fixed effects logistic regression models were used to test associations between medical skepticism and 10 CAM use categories. Some form of CAM was used by 88% of the sample. Increased skepticism was associated with one CAM category for the non-specialist group and six categories for the specialist group. Increased medical skepticism is associated with CAM use, but medical skepticism is more often associated with CAM use for those seeing specialists.

摘要

医学怀疑论是对传统医疗显著改善健康状况能力的保留态度。患有肌肉骨骼疾病的患者看专科医生时通常会有更高程度的残疾;因此,可以预期他们可能对当前治疗更加怀疑,从而更有可能尝试补充和替代医学(CAM)。本研究的目的是确定这些关系。这些数据来自对两个队列的横断面调查:看专科医生的人群(n = 1344)和非专科医生的人群(n = 724)。使用站点层面的固定效应逻辑回归模型来检验医学怀疑论与10种补充和替代医学使用类别之间的关联。样本中有88%的人使用了某种形式的补充和替代医学。怀疑程度增加与非专科医生组的一种补充和替代医学类别以及专科医生组的六种类别相关。医学怀疑论的增加与补充和替代医学的使用有关,但医学怀疑论更常与看专科医生的人的补充和替代医学使用相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b38e/2581824/a395b3f83e40/TORJ-1-5_F1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验