Sipert Carla Renata, Hussne Renata Pardini, Nishiyama Celso Kenji
Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais - USP, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2006 Jan;14(1):6-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000100002.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of root canal cleaning of the RaCe rotary instrumentation system (FKG Dentaire - La-Cheaux-de Fonds - Switzerland), compared to manual filing with Stainless Steel K-files (Maillefer Instruments - Ballaigues - Switzerland).
Twenty extracted human teeth (maxillary molars) were selected and their pulp tissue was removed after coronal access. The root canals were filled with a dye (India ink) and allowed to dry for 48 hours, followed by establishment of the working length of the mesiobuccal root; then, half of the specimens were instrumented by the modified Oregon technique and the other half were instrumented by crown-down sequence of the RaCe system. After preparation, the teeth were longitudinally sectioned and evaluated according to the amount of remaining dye.
Data obtained were registered as numerical scores, and the arithmetic means were compared between groups using the Mann Whitney test. Both techniques were unable to completely clean the interior of the root canals, with a better performance of the manual technique only at the middle third.
It could be concluded that the RaCe system was able to provide satisfactory cleaning, similar to that obtained by the manual instrumentation technique.
本研究旨在评估RaCe旋转器械系统(瑞士FKG Dentaire公司,拉绍德封)与使用不锈钢K锉(瑞士Maillefer Instruments公司,巴拉格)手动锉相比,进行根管清理的能力。
选取20颗拔除的人牙(上颌磨牙),在开髓后去除牙髓组织。根管内充满染料(印度墨水),放置48小时使其干燥,随后确定近中颊根的工作长度;然后,一半标本采用改良的俄勒冈技术进行预备,另一半采用RaCe系统的冠向下顺序进行预备。预备后,将牙齿纵向剖开,根据残留染料的量进行评估。
获得的数据记录为数值分数,使用曼-惠特尼检验比较两组的算术平均值。两种技术均无法完全清理根管内部,仅在根管中1/3处手动技术表现更佳。
可以得出结论,RaCe系统能够提供令人满意的清理效果,与手动预备技术相当。