Honório Heitor Marques, Rios Daniela, Abdo Ruy César Camargo, Machado Maria Aparecida de Andrade Moreira
Bauru Dental School.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2006 Apr;14(2):117-23. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000200010.
Considering the importance of professional plaque control for caries prevention, this study comprised an in vitro evaluation of wear by two prophylaxis methods (sodium bicarbonate jet - Profident and pumice and brush) on sound bovine enamel and with artificial carious lesions. Sixty enamel fragments were employed (4x4mm), which were divided into 4 groups: GI - 15 sound blocks treated with pumice and brush; GII - 15 sound blocks treated with Profident; GIII - 15 demineralized blocks treated with pumice and brush, and GIV - 15 demineralized blocks treated with Profident. In the fragments of Groups III and IV, artificial carious lesions were simulated by immersion in 0.05M acetic acid solution 50% saturated with bovine enamel powder at 37 degrees C for 16h. The specimens were submitted to the prophylactic treatments for 10 seconds. Wear analysis was performed by profilometer and revealed the following results: 0.91microm - GI; 0.42microm - GII; 1.6microm - GIII, and 0.94microm - GIV. The two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05) revealed significant difference between all groups. Scanning electron microscopy images were employed to illustrate the wear pattern, with observation of larger alteration on the demineralized enamel surface (GIII; GIV), round-shaped wear on GI and GIII and blasted aspect on GII and GIV. The study indicated that the demineralized enamel presented more wear than the sound enamel, and the brush led to larger wear when compared to Profident.
考虑到专业的菌斑控制对预防龋齿的重要性,本研究对两种预防方法(碳酸氢钠喷射——Profident和浮石与牙刷)在完好的牛牙釉质以及人工龋损上的磨损情况进行了体外评估。使用了60个釉质碎片(4×4毫米),将其分为4组:GI组——15个完好的牙块用浮石和牙刷处理;GII组——15个完好的牙块用Profident处理;GIII组——15个脱矿牙块用浮石和牙刷处理,以及GIV组——15个脱矿牙块用Profident处理。在III组和IV组的碎片中,通过将其浸入37摄氏度下50%饱和了牛牙釉质粉末的0.05M乙酸溶液中16小时来模拟人工龋损。将标本进行10秒的预防性处理。通过轮廓仪进行磨损分析,结果如下:GI组为0.91微米;GII组为0.42微米;GIII组为1.6微米,GIV组为0.94微米。双向方差分析和Tukey检验(p<0.05)显示所有组之间存在显著差异。使用扫描电子显微镜图像来说明磨损模式,观察到脱矿釉质表面(GIII组;GIV组)有更大的改变,GI组和GIII组有圆形磨损,GII组和GIV组有喷砂样外观。该研究表明,脱矿釉质比完好釉质磨损更多,并且与Profident相比,牙刷导致的磨损更大。