Gerbo L R, Lacefield W R, Barnes C M, Russell C M
Department of Diagnostic Sciences, University of Alabama School of Dentistry, Birmingham 35294.
Am J Dent. 1993 Apr;6(2):96-8.
The purpose of this study was to quantify differences in enamel surface roughness following treatment with an air abrasive system when compared to a rubber cup and pumice. The coronal portion of 40 bovine teeth were tested. Half of the teeth were placed in a control group and cleansed with a rubber cup and pumice, the other half or "test" group were treated with an air-powder polisher. All teeth were exposed to the given cleansing agent for a time equivalent to a 15-year recall program. Pre- and post-treatment surface evaluation was completed using a surface profilometer. In addition, representative samples were evaluated before and after cleansing under the scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results of this study showed no statistically significant increase in enamel surface roughness in teeth cleansed with the air polisher when compared to the roughness of the control teeth. This was confirmed visually by use of SEM taken at magnifications of up to x1000. The findings of this study indicate there is no significant alteration of the enamel surface when a tooth is treated with an air-powder polisher for the equivalent of a 15-year recall program.
本研究的目的是量化与橡胶杯和浮石相比,使用空气研磨系统处理后牙釉质表面粗糙度的差异。对40颗牛牙的冠部进行了测试。将一半牙齿置于对照组,用橡胶杯和浮石清洁,另一半即“测试”组用空气粉末抛光机处理。所有牙齿暴露于给定的清洁剂中的时间相当于15年复查计划的时间。使用表面轮廓仪完成处理前和处理后的表面评估。此外,在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下对代表性样本在清洁前后进行评估。本研究结果表明,与对照牙齿的粗糙度相比,用空气抛光机清洁的牙齿的牙釉质表面粗糙度没有统计学上的显著增加。通过使用放大倍数高达x1000的SEM进行目视确认。本研究结果表明,当用空气粉末抛光机对牙齿进行相当于15年复查计划的处理时,牙釉质表面没有明显改变。