Bona Alvaro Della, Pinzetta Caroline, Rosa Vinícius
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Jun;15(3):230-4. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000300014.
The purposes of this study were to evaluate the sealing ability of different glass ionomer cements (GICs) used for sandwich restorations and to assess the effect of acid etching of GIC on microleakage at GIC-resin composite interface. Forty cavities were prepared on the proximal surfaces of 20 permanent human premolars (2 cavities per tooth), assigned to 4 groups (n=10) and restored as follows: Group CIE - conventional GIC (CI) was applied onto the axial and cervical cavity walls, allowed setting for 5 min and acid etched (E) along the cavity margins with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 s, washed for 30 s and water was blotted; the adhesive system was applied and light cured for 10 s, completing the restoration with composite resin light cured for 40 s; Group CIN - same as Group CIE, except for acid etching of the CI surface; Group RME - same as CIE, but using a resin modified GIC (RMGIC); Group RMN - same as Group RME, except for acid etching of the RMGIC surface. Specimens were soaked in 1% methylene blue dye solution at 24 degrees C for 24 h, rinsed under running water for 1 h, bisected longitudinally and dye penetration was measured following the ISO/TS 11405-2003 standard. Results were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests (a=0.05). Dye penetration scores were as follow: CIE - 2.5; CIN - 2.5; RME - 0.9; and RMN - 0.6. The results suggest that phosphoric acid etching of GIC prior to the placement of composite resin does not improve the sealing ability of sandwich restorations. The RMGIC was more effective in preventing dye penetration at the GIC-resin composite-dentin interfaces than CI.
本研究的目的是评估用于三明治修复的不同玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)的封闭能力,并评估GIC酸蚀对GIC-树脂复合体界面微渗漏的影响。在20颗人类恒牙前磨牙的近中面制备40个洞(每颗牙2个洞),分为4组(n = 10),并按以下方式进行修复:CIE组——将传统GIC(CI)涂覆于洞的轴壁和颈壁,放置5分钟,然后沿洞缘用35%磷酸酸蚀(E)15秒,冲洗30秒并吸干水分;涂抹粘结系统并光固化10秒,用复合树脂光固化40秒完成修复;CIN组——与CIE组相同,只是不酸蚀CI表面;RME组——与CIE组相同,但使用树脂改性GIC(RMGIC);RMN组——与RME组相同,只是不酸蚀RMGIC表面。将标本在24℃的1%亚甲蓝染料溶液中浸泡24小时,流水冲洗1小时,纵向剖开,按照ISO/TS 11405-2003标准测量染料渗透情况。结果采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和卡方检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。染料渗透评分如下:CIE组——2.5;CIN组——2.5;RME组——0.9;RMN组——0.6。结果表明,在复合树脂充填前对GIC进行磷酸酸蚀并不能提高三明治修复体的封闭能力。与CI相比,RMGIC在防止染料渗透到GIC-树脂复合体-牙本质界面方面更有效。