Suppr超能文献

酸蚀和粘结剂应用对复合树脂和玻璃离子水门汀粘结强度的影响。

Effects of etching and adhesive applications on the bond strength between composite resin and glass-ionomer cements.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Nov-Dec;20(6):636-42. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000600008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study determined the effects of various surface treatment modalities on the bond strength of composite resins to glass-ionomer cements.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Conventional (Ketac Molar Quick Applicap) or resin-modified (Photac Fil Quick Aplicap) glass-ionomer cements were prepared. Two-step etch-rinse & bond adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2) or single-step self-etching adhesive (Adper Prompt L-Pop) was applied to the set cements. In the etch-rinse & bond group, the sample surfaces were pre-treated as follows: (1) no etching, (2) 15 s of etching with 35% phosphoric acid, (3) 30 s of etching, and (4) 60 s of etching. Following the placement of the composite resin (Filtek Z250), the bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine and the data obtained were analyzed with the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey's HSD post hoc analysis (p=0.05). Then, the fractured surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

The bond strength of the composite resin to the conventional glass-ionomer cement was significantly lower than that to the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (p<0.001). No significant differences were determined between the self-etching and etch-rinse & bond adhesives at any etching time (p>0.05). However, a greater bond strength was obtained with 30 s of phosphoric acid application.

CONCLUSIONS

The resin-modified glass-ionomer cement improved the bond strength of the composite resin to the glass-ionomer cement. Both etch-rinse & bond and self-etching adhesives may be used effectively in the lamination of glass-ionomer cements. However, an etching time of at least 30 s appears to be optimal.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定不同表面处理方式对复合树脂与玻璃离子水门汀粘结强度的影响。

材料与方法

制备常规(Ketac Molar Quick Applicap)或树脂改性(Photac Fil Quick Aplicap)玻璃离子水门汀。两步酸蚀-冲洗粘结剂(Adper Single Bond 2)或单步自酸蚀粘结剂(Adper Prompt L-Pop)应用于凝固的水门汀上。在酸蚀-冲洗粘结组中,样品表面进行如下预处理:(1)不酸蚀,(2)用 35%磷酸酸蚀 15s,(3)酸蚀 30s,(4)酸蚀 60s。在放置复合树脂(Filtek Z250)后,在万能试验机上测量粘结强度,并用双因素方差分析(ANOVA)对所得数据进行分析,然后用 Tukey 的 HSD 事后分析(p=0.05)。然后,用扫描电子显微镜观察断裂面。

结果

复合树脂与常规玻璃离子水门汀的粘结强度明显低于与树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的粘结强度(p<0.001)。在任何酸蚀时间下,自酸蚀和酸蚀-冲洗粘结剂之间均无显著差异(p>0.05)。然而,应用磷酸 30s 时获得的粘结强度更大。

结论

树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀提高了复合树脂与玻璃离子水门汀的粘结强度。酸蚀-冲洗粘结剂和自酸蚀粘结剂均可有效地用于玻璃离子水门汀的层压。然而,酸蚀时间至少 30s 似乎是最佳的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abc/3881859/95f3b9cb5d9b/jaos-20-06-0636-g01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验