Dahm Philipp, Poolman Rudolf W, Bhandari Mohit, Fesperman Susan F, Baum Jan, Kosiak Beth, Carrick Todd, Preminger Glenn M
Department of Urology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0247, USA.
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):767-77. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.031. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
We investigated the attitudes and opinions of urologists toward evidence-based medicine to help guide future efforts of the American Urological Association and other organizations vested in the education and training of urologists.
From August to November 2006 we performed a mail survey of a random sample of 2,000 members of the American Urological Association. Questions in the survey addressed the role of evidence-based medicine in urology, participants' self-assessed understanding of evidence-based medicine related terminology, their familiarity with and use of web based evidence-based medicine resources, as well as their evidence-based medicine competence based on their understanding of core concepts such as randomization and blinding.
A total of 889 respondents completed the survey resulting in a response rate of 45%. There was widespread agreement that practicing evidence-based medicine improves patient care (median score 8; IQR 7, 10) and that every urologist should be familiar with critical appraisal techniques (median score 9; IQR 8, 10). The percentage of respondents who indicated that they "understand and could explain to others" the terms number needed to treat, power and level of evidence was 42%, 29% and 18%, respectively. The American Urological Association Guidelines were used regularly by 35% and on occasion by 51% of respondents. Of the participants 44% were unaware of the PubMed(R) search engine and only 14% used it regularly, while 76% were unaware of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and only 8% had ever used it. The mean evidence-based medicine competence score for all respondents was 67.2% +/- 17.0%.
The findings of this survey confirm that urologists have a favorable attitude toward evidence-based medicine. However, understanding of evidence-based medicine terminology, concepts and use of related resources among American Urological Association members leaves room for improvement. Increased efforts to promote an understanding of evidence-based medicine through workshops, publications and web based resources specifically for a urological audience appear indicated.
我们调查了泌尿科医生对循证医学的态度和观点,以帮助指导美国泌尿外科学会及其他致力于泌尿科医生教育和培训的组织未来的工作。
2006年8月至11月,我们对随机抽取的2000名美国泌尿外科学会会员进行了邮件调查。调查问题涉及循证医学在泌尿外科中的作用、参与者对循证医学相关术语的自我评估理解、他们对基于网络的循证医学资源的熟悉程度和使用情况,以及基于他们对随机化和盲法等核心概念的理解的循证医学能力。
共有889名受访者完成了调查,回复率为45%。普遍认为实施循证医学可改善患者护理(中位数评分8;四分位间距7, 10),并且每位泌尿科医生都应熟悉批判性评估技术(中位数评分9;四分位间距8, 10)。表示“理解并能向他人解释”治疗所需人数、检验效能和证据水平这些术语的受访者比例分别为42%、29%和18%。35%的受访者经常使用美国泌尿外科学会指南,51%的受访者偶尔使用。44%的参与者不知道PubMed搜索引擎,只有14%的人经常使用它,而76%的人不知道Cochrane系统评价数据库,只有8%的人曾经使用过。所有受访者的循证医学能力平均得分为67.2%±17.0%。
本次调查结果证实泌尿科医生对循证医学持积极态度。然而,美国泌尿外科学会成员对循证医学术语、概念及相关资源的使用的理解仍有改进空间。似乎需要加大力度,通过专门针对泌尿科受众的研讨会、出版物和网络资源来促进对循证医学的理解。