Phua Yun Shan, Salkeld Lesley J, de Chalain Tristan M B
Cleft and Craniofacial Surgery Service, Regional Centre for Plastic Surgery, Middlemore Hospital, Private Bag 93311, Otahuhu, Auckland, New Zealand.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Feb;73(2):307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.10.026. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
There is wide international variation in the protocols used for middle ear disease management in cleft palate patients. Ventilation tube (grommet) insertion may occur routinely at the time of palatoplasty or selectively on a separate occasion if symptomatic middle ear disease develops. The audiological and otologic outcomes of cleft palate patients were studied in a single institution over a timeframe in which both protocols were utilised.
This was a retrospective study of 234 cleft palate patients who underwent palatoplasty from 1990 to 2005 at Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. Data on hearing loss, middle ear disease, and tympanic membrane abnormalities was collected from clinical notes. Audiological data was obtained from pure tone audiogram reports.
Forty-five patients had routine grommets inserted concurrent with palatoplasty and 189 patients were managed conservatively with selective grommet insertion if indicated. Grommets were subsequently required in 79 (41.8%) of these 189 patients. There was no difference in the incidence of persistent conductive hearing loss, but recurrent middle ear disease, tympanic membrane abnormalities, and the total number of grommet insertions were significantly higher in the routine grommet group. Poorer outcomes were noted in patients who had undergone a greater number of grommet insertions.
No significant deterioration in audiological outcomes and better otologic outcomes were found in cleft palate patients undergoing selective grommet insertion compared to routine grommet insertion. It is recommended that ventilation tube placement occur in patients selected on the basis of symptomatic infection or significant hearing loss.
腭裂患者中耳疾病的治疗方案在国际上存在很大差异。通气导管(鼓膜通气管)插入术可在腭裂修复术时常规进行,或者如果出现有症状的中耳疾病,则在单独的时机选择性进行。在一个同时采用这两种方案的时间段内,在单一机构对腭裂患者的听力学和耳科结局进行了研究。
这是一项对1990年至2005年在新西兰奥克兰Middlemore医院接受腭裂修复术的234例腭裂患者的回顾性研究。从临床记录中收集有关听力损失、中耳疾病和鼓膜异常的数据。听力学数据从纯音听力图报告中获取。
45例患者在腭裂修复术同时常规插入鼓膜通气管,189例患者在有指征时采用选择性插入鼓膜通气管的保守治疗。在这189例患者中,有79例(41.8%)随后需要插入鼓膜通气管。持续性传导性听力损失的发生率没有差异,但常规鼓膜通气管组的复发性中耳疾病、鼓膜异常以及鼓膜通气管插入的总数显著更高。鼓膜通气管插入次数较多的患者结局较差。
与常规插入鼓膜通气管相比,选择性插入鼓膜通气管的腭裂患者听力学结局没有显著恶化,耳科结局更好。建议根据有症状的感染或明显听力损失来选择患者进行通气导管置入。