The Healing Foundation Cleft and Craniofacial Clinical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jul;16(6):573-87. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0610-8. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
There is a paucity of evidence to guide the management of otitis media with effusion (OME), which is a common problem causing significant hearing impairment in children with cleft palate. The insertion of grommets is currently being used to correct hearing impairment and prevent complications of unmanaged OME, but there is ongoing discussion about whether the benefits of grommets outweigh the costs and risks. A decision-tree model was developed to assess the surgical insertion of grommets with two non-surgical alternatives (hearing-aids and do-nothing strategies) in cleft palate children with persistent bilateral OME. The model assumed a 2-year time horizon and a UK National Health Service perspective. Outcomes were valued using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) estimated by linking utility values with potential hearing gains measured in decibels. Multiple data sources were used, including reviews of the clinical effectiveness, resource use and utility literature, and supplemented with expert opinion. Uncertainty in the model parameters was assessed using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Expected value of perfect information analysis was used to calculate the potential value of future research. The results from the probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the grommets strategy was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £9,065 per QALY gained compared with the do-nothing strategy, and the hearing-aids strategy was extended dominated by the grommets strategy. The population expected value of perfect information was £5,194,030 at a willingness to pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY, implying that future research could be potentially worthwhile. This study found some evidence that the insertion of grommets to manage cleft palate children with bilateral OME is likely to be cost-effective, but further research is required to inform this treatment choice.
目前缺乏指导分泌性中耳炎(OME)管理的证据,而OME 是腭裂儿童导致听力严重受损的常见问题。目前,通过鼓膜置管来矫正听力障碍并预防OME 管理不善导致的并发症,但是否需要通过手术来置管仍存在争议,这需要权衡手术的获益与成本和风险。本研究开发了一个决策树模型,以评估在持续性双侧 OME 的腭裂儿童中,手术鼓膜置管与两种非手术选择(助听器和不治疗策略)相比的效果。模型假设了 2 年的时间范围和英国国家医疗服务体系的视角。使用与潜在听力增益(以分贝为单位)相关联的效用值来评估质量调整生命年(QALYs),以此作为结果的衡量指标。该模型使用了多种数据来源,包括对临床疗效、资源利用和效用文献的综述,并辅以专家意见。使用概率敏感性分析评估模型参数的不确定性。使用完全信息期望价值分析来计算未来研究的潜在价值。概率敏感性分析的结果表明,与不治疗策略相比,鼓膜置管策略的增量成本效益比为每获得一个 QALY 增加 9065 英镑,而助听器策略则被鼓膜置管策略完全支配。在支付意愿阈值为 20,000 英镑/QALY 的情况下,人群完全信息的期望价值为 5,194,030 英镑,这意味着未来的研究可能是值得的。本研究发现,有一些证据表明,通过鼓膜置管来管理腭裂伴双侧OME 的儿童可能具有成本效益,但需要进一步的研究来为这种治疗选择提供信息。