von Peter Sebastian
Department of Psychiatry and Pshotherapy, Hospital of Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Transcult Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;45(4):639-51. doi: 10.1177/1363461508100786.
Approaches to the mental health care of refugees and disaster survivors have recently been subject to sustained critique. This article critically examines the notion of ;mental trauma' as it has been used by psychosocial intervention programmes addressing the aftermath of the 2004 Asian tsunami. The objective is to shed light on the guidelines' implicit and explicit assumptions about how people are expected to act and feel after a disaster, thereby implying a certain 'metaphysic' of emotional experience. It will be argued that feelings can not be separated from intersubjective and public spheres, for they shape and motivate expression and experience. Instead, it is necessary to explore the particular ways in which cultural meaning and social structure relate to discourses and practices through which suffering is produced and represented. To conclude, a method is outlined to operationalize particular experiences of suffering and the institutionalized discourses and practices in which they obtain social meaning and force.
难民和灾难幸存者的心理健康护理方法最近受到了持续的批评。本文批判性地审视了“心理创伤”这一概念,它被用于应对2004年亚洲海啸后果的社会心理干预项目中。目的是揭示这些指导方针关于人们在灾难后应如何行动和感受的隐含和明确假设,从而暗示一种特定的情感体验“形而上学”。将论证情感不能与主体间和公共领域分离,因为它们塑造并激发表达和体验。相反,有必要探索文化意义和社会结构与苦难产生和呈现的话语及实践相关的特定方式。最后,概述了一种方法,以实施苦难的特定体验以及它们获得社会意义和力量的制度化话语及实践。