Suppr超能文献

等渗碘克沙醇与非离子型低渗对比剂的肾毒性比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol compared with nonionic low-osmolar contrast media: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Heinrich Marc C, Häberle Lothar, Müller Volker, Bautz Werner, Uder Michael

机构信息

Institute of Radiology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Radiology. 2009 Jan;250(1):68-86. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2501080833.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol with that of nonionic low-osmolar contrast media (CM) (LOCM) in randomized clinical trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This meta-analysis was conducted with a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Web of Science, ISI Web of Knowledge, Current Contents Medizin, Cochrane Library (until August 2007), trial registers, conference proceedings, and reference lists to identify studies and with requests from all manufacturers of CM for unidentified studies. Randomized controlled trials assessing serum creatinine levels before and after intravascular application of iodixanol or LOCM were included. The primary outcome measures were the incidence of contrast medium-induced nephropathy (CIN) and change in serum creatinine levels.

RESULTS

Twenty-five trials were included. Iodixanol did not significantly reduce the risk of CIN (relative risk [RR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61, 1.04; weighted mean difference in serum creatinine increase, 0.01 mg/dL [0.88 mumol/L]; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.03). There was no significant risk reduction after intravenous administration of the CM (RR, 1.08; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.89); subgroup with preexisting renal insufficiency (RR, 1.07; 95% CI: 0.56, 2.02) or after intraarterial administration (RR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.01); subgroup with preexisting renal insufficiency (RR, 0.59; 95% CI: 0.33, 1.07). However, in patients with intraarterial administration and renal insufficiency, the risk of CIN was greater for iohexol than for iodixanol (RR, 0.38; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.68), whereas there was no difference between iodixanol and the other (noniohexol) LOCM (RR, 0.95; 95% CI: 0.50, 1.78).

CONCLUSION

Iodixanol is not associated with a significantly reduced risk of CIN compared with the LOCM pooled together. However, in patients with intraarterial administration and renal insufficiency, iodixanol is associated with a reduced risk of CIN compared with iohexol, whereas no significant difference between iodixanol and other LOCM could be found.

摘要

目的

在随机临床试验中比较等渗碘克沙醇与非离子低渗对比剂(CM)(低渗对比剂)的肾毒性。

材料与方法

本荟萃分析通过系统检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、BIOSIS、科学网、ISI知识网、《医学当前内容》、Cochrane图书馆(截至2007年8月)、试验注册库、会议论文集及参考文献列表来识别研究,并向所有CM制造商索取未识别的研究。纳入评估血管内应用碘克沙醇或低渗对比剂前后血清肌酐水平的随机对照试验。主要结局指标为对比剂肾病(CIN)的发生率及血清肌酐水平的变化。

结果

纳入25项试验。碘克沙醇未显著降低CIN风险(相对风险[RR],0.80;95%置信区间[CI]:0.61,1.04;血清肌酐升高的加权平均差异,0.01mg/dL[0.88μmol/L];95%CI:-0.01,0.03)。静脉注射CM后无显著风险降低(RR,1.08;95%CI:0.62,1.89);存在肾功能不全的亚组(RR,1.07;95%CI:0.56,2.02)或动脉内给药后(RR,0.68;95%CI:0.46,1.01);存在肾功能不全的亚组(RR,0.59;95%CI:0.33,1.07)。然而,在动脉内给药且肾功能不全的患者中,碘海醇导致CIN的风险高于碘克沙醇(RR,0.38;95%CI:0.21,0.68),而碘克沙醇与其他(非碘海醇)低渗对比剂之间无差异(RR,0.95;95%CI:0.50,1.78)。

结论

与汇总的低渗对比剂相比,碘克沙醇未显著降低CIN风险。然而,在动脉内给药且肾功能不全的患者中,与碘海醇相比,碘克沙醇导致CIN的风险降低,而碘克沙醇与其他低渗对比剂之间未发现显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验