• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾功能不全患者行冠状动脉造影时威视派克(碘克沙醇)与六溴环已胺(碘克沙葡胺)的肾毒性评估及比较:RECOVER研究:一项随机对照试验

Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between visipaque (iodixanol) and hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography: the RECOVER study: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Jo Sang-Ho, Youn Tae-Jin, Koo Bon-Kwon, Park Jin-Shik, Kang Hyun-Jae, Cho Young-Seok, Chung Woo-Young, Joo Gwon-Wook, Chae In-Ho, Choi Dong-Ju, Oh Byung-Hee, Lee Myoung-Mook, Park Young-Bae, Kim Hyo-Soo

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine/Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 5;48(5):924-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.047. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.047
PMID:16949481
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the nephrotoxicity of iodixanol and ioxaglate in patients with renal impairment undergoing coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND

Iodixanol, a nonionic, dimeric, iso-osmolar contrast medium (IOCM), may be less nephrotoxic than low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) in high-risk patients.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized trial in 300 adults with creatinine clearance (CrCl) < or =60 ml/min, patients received either iodixanol or ioxaglate and underwent coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) (an increase in serum creatinine [SCr] > or =25% or > or =0.5 mg/dl [> or =44.2 mumol/l]). The incidence of CIN in patients with severe renal impairment at baseline (CrCl <30 ml/min) or diabetes and in those receiving large doses (> or =140 ml) of contrast medium was also determined.

RESULTS

The incidence of CIN was significantly lower with iodixanol (7.9%) than with ioxaglate (17.0%; p = 0.021), corresponding to an odds ratio (OR) of CIN of 0.415 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.194 to 0.889) for iodixanol. The incidence of CIN was also significantly lower with iodixanol in patients with severe renal impairment (p = 0.023) or concomitant diabetes (p = 0.041), or in patients given > or =140 ml of contrast media (p = 0.038). Multivariate analysis identified use of ioxaglate (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.11 to 6.33, p = 0.028), baseline SCr, mg/dl (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.85, p = 0.038), and left ventricular ejection fraction, % (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.99, p = 0.019) as independent risk factors for CIN.

CONCLUSIONS

The IOCM iodixanol was significantly less nephrotoxic than ioxaglate, an ionic, dimeric LOCM. (The RECOVER Trial; http://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00247325).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较碘克沙醇和碘克酸对接受冠状动脉造影的肾功能不全患者的肾毒性。

背景

碘克沙醇是一种非离子二聚体等渗造影剂(IOCM),在高危患者中,其肾毒性可能低于低渗造影剂(LOCM)。

方法

在一项针对300名肌酐清除率(CrCl)≤60 ml/分钟的成年人的前瞻性随机试验中,患者接受碘克沙醇或碘克酸,并接受冠状动脉造影,伴或不伴经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。主要终点是造影剂肾病(CIN)的发生率(血清肌酐[SCr]升高≥25%或≥0.5 mg/dl[≥44.2 μmol/l])。还确定了基线时严重肾功能不全(CrCl<30 ml/分钟)或糖尿病患者以及接受大剂量(≥140 ml)造影剂患者的CIN发生率。

结果

碘克沙醇组的CIN发生率(7.9%)显著低于碘克酸组(17.0%;p = 0.021),碘克沙醇的CIN优势比(OR)为0.415(95%置信区间[CI]0.194至0.889)。在严重肾功能不全患者(p = 0.023)、合并糖尿病患者(p = 0.041)或接受≥140 ml造影剂的患者中,碘克沙醇组的CIN发生率也显著较低(p = 0.038)。多变量分析确定使用碘克酸(OR 2.65,95%CI 1.11至6.33,p = 0.028)、基线SCr(mg/dl)(OR 2.0,95%CI 1.04至3.85,p = 0.038)和左心室射血分数(%)(OR 0.97,95%CI 0.94至0.99,p = 0.019)为CIN的独立危险因素。

结论

IOCM碘克沙醇的肾毒性显著低于离子二聚体LOCM碘克酸。(RECOVER试验;http://clinicaltrials.gov;NCT00247325)

相似文献

1
Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between visipaque (iodixanol) and hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography: the RECOVER study: a randomized controlled trial.肾功能不全患者行冠状动脉造影时威视派克(碘克沙醇)与六溴环已胺(碘克沙葡胺)的肾毒性评估及比较:RECOVER研究:一项随机对照试验
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 5;48(5):924-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.047. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
2
Ionic low-osmolar versus nonionic iso-osmolar contrast media to obviate worsening nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients: the ICON (Ionic versus non-ionic Contrast to Obviate worsening Nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients) study.离子型低渗与非离子型等渗对比剂在慢性肾衰竭患者血管成形术后避免肾功能恶化的比较:ICON(离子型与非离子型对比剂在慢性肾衰竭患者血管成形术后避免肾功能恶化的研究)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May;2(5):415-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.007.
3
[Comparison of iodixanol (Visipaque) and ioxaglate (Hexabrix) in coronary angiography and ventriculography: a double-blind randomized study].[碘克沙醇(威视派克)与碘克酸(泛影葡胺)在冠状动脉造影和心室造影中的比较:一项双盲随机研究]
J Radiol. 1999 Jul;80(7):727-32.
4
Comparison of contrast-induced nephrotoxicity of iodixanol and iopromide in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography.碘海醇和碘普罗胺在肾功能不全患者冠状动脉造影中对比性肾毒性的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jul 15;108(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.019. Epub 2011 May 3.
5
Renal failure in 57 925 patients undergoing coronary procedures using iso-osmolar or low-osmolar contrast media.57925例接受使用等渗或低渗造影剂的冠状动脉手术患者的肾衰竭情况。
Kidney Int. 2006 Nov;70(10):1811-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001887. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
6
Iodixanol versus low-osmolar contrast media for prevention of contrast induced nephropathy: meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.碘克沙醇与低渗造影剂预防造影剂肾病的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(4):351-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.917070. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
7
One-year results of the ICON (Ionic versus non-ionic Contrast to Obviate worsening Nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients) Study.ICON(离子型与非离子型对比剂预防慢性肾衰竭患者血管成形术后肾病恶化)研究的一年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar;87(4):703-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26106. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial on the efficacy and cardiorenal safety of iodixanol vs. iopromide in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention.一项关于碘克沙醇与碘普罗胺在接受冠状动脉造影(无论是否进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗)的慢性肾脏病患者中的疗效及心肾安全性的前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):958-65. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21713.
9
The relative renal safety of iodixanol compared with low-osmolar contrast media: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.与低渗性造影剂相比,碘克沙醇的相对肾脏安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul;2(7):645-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.002.
10
A randomized prospective trial of ioxaglate 320 (Hexabrix) vs. iodixanol 320 (Visipaque) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.一项关于碘克沙醇320(Hexabrix)与碘海醇320(威视派克)用于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的随机前瞻性试验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Nov;57(3):346-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10326.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Iodixanol in Computed Coronary Tomographic Angiography and Cardiac Catheterization.碘克沙醇在冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影和心脏导管插入术中的有效性和安全性。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Oct 31;10(11):449. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10110449.
2
3D-Printed Radiopaque Bioresorbable Stents to Improve Device Visualization.3D 打印不透射线可生物吸收支架以改善器械可视化。
Adv Healthc Mater. 2022 Dec;11(23):e2201955. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202201955. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
Three-Dimensional Kidney-on-a-Chip Assessment of Contrast-Induced Kidney Injury: Osmolality and Viscosity.
对比剂所致肾损伤的三维肾芯片评估:渗透压和黏度
Micromachines (Basel). 2022 Apr 28;13(5):688. doi: 10.3390/mi13050688.
4
Low-Osmolar vs. Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media on the Risk of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Propensity Score Matched Study.低渗与等渗对比剂对对比剂诱发急性肾损伤风险的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 29;9:862023. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.862023. eCollection 2022.
5
Optimizing the Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.优化慢性肾脏病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结局
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 23;11(9):2380. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092380.
6
Different outcomes between iso-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media in acute myocardial infarction with renal impairment.肾功能不全的急性心肌梗死患者中,等渗与低渗对比剂的结局不同。
Cardiol J. 2023;30(5):790-798. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0171. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
7
Iso-osmolar Iodixanol Is Better than Low-osmolar Contrast for CIN Prevention. And Then?等渗碘克沙醇在预防造影剂肾病方面优于低渗造影剂。那又如何呢?
Korean Circ J. 2021 Feb;51(2):182-184. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0003.
8
Contrast Induced Nephropathy and 2-Year Outcomes of Iso-Osmolar Compared with Low-Osmolar Contrast Media after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后等渗与低渗对比剂所致对比剂肾病及2年预后
Korean Circ J. 2021 Feb;51(2):174-181. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0307.
9
Should Percutaneous Coronary Intervention be the Standard Treatment Strategy for Significant Coronary Artery Disease in all Octogenarians?高龄 80 岁以上患者的严重冠状动脉疾病是否应采用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗作为标准治疗策略?
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(3):244-259. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16666200903153823.
10
Guideline on the use of iodinated contrast media in patients with kidney disease 2018.《2018年肾病患者使用碘化造影剂指南》
Jpn J Radiol. 2020 Jan;38(1):3-46. doi: 10.1007/s11604-019-00850-2.