• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过在加利福尼亚州洛杉矶河流域实施O号提案改善水质。

Water quality improvement by implementation of Proposition O in the Los Angeles river watershed, California.

作者信息

Park Mi-Hyun, Pincetl Stephanie, Stenstrom Michael K

机构信息

Institute of Environment, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(12):2271-8. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.804.

DOI:10.2166/wst.2008.804
PMID:19092205
Abstract

Proposition O was created to help the City of Los Angeles comply with the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements under the Clean Water Act. In this study, the effectiveness of the Proposition O projects in Los Angeles River watershed was examined to show whether it achieves the goal of meeting water quality standards. Our analysis shows the most effective single project will remove at most 2% of pollutant loads from Los Angeles River Watershed and will not achieve TMDL compliance, although several projects can make important contributions to achieve compliance. The ranking results show that the projects that treat the runoff from the largest drainage area have the greatest impact on the water quality of Los Angeles river.

摘要

O号提案旨在帮助洛杉矶市遵守《清洁水法》规定的总最大日负荷(TMDL)要求。在本研究中,对洛杉矶河流域O号提案项目的有效性进行了评估,以确定其是否实现了达到水质标准的目标。我们的分析表明,最有效的单个项目最多只能去除洛杉矶河流域2%的污染物负荷,无法实现TMDL合规,尽管有几个项目可为实现合规做出重要贡献。排名结果显示,处理最大排水区域径流的项目对洛杉矶河水质的影响最大。

相似文献

1
Water quality improvement by implementation of Proposition O in the Los Angeles river watershed, California.通过在加利福尼亚州洛杉矶河流域实施O号提案改善水质。
Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(12):2271-8. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.804.
2
Water quality improvement policies: lessons learned from the implementation of Proposition O in Los Angeles, California.
Environ Manage. 2009 Mar;43(3):514-22. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9262-8. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
3
Linking trading ratio with TMDL (total maximum daily load) allocation matrix and uncertainty analysis.将交易比率与总最大日负荷(TMDL)分配矩阵及不确定性分析相联系。
Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(1):103-8. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.604.
4
Investigation of river eutrophication as part of a low dissolved oxygen total maximum daily load implementation.作为低溶解氧每日最大总负荷实施的一部分对河流富营养化进行调查。
Water Sci Technol. 2009;59(1):9-14. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.739.
5
Ranking methods to set restoration and remediation priorities on a watershed scale.
Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(10):2025-30. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.567.
6
Influence of the South-North Water Diversion Project and the mitigation projects on the water quality of Han River.南水北调工程及缓解项目对汉江水质的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2008 Nov 15;406(1-2):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
7
Watershed monitoring and modelling and USA regulatory compliance.流域监测与建模以及美国法规合规情况。
Water Sci Technol. 2004;50(11):7-12.
8
The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept.《水框架指令》背景下恢复水质的社会效益:支付意愿与接受意愿的比较
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Aug 1;407(16):4574-83. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 May 27.
9
Characteristics of wet and dry weather heavy metal discharges in the Yeongsan Watershed, Korea.韩国荣山江流域干湿天气下重金属排放特征
Sci Total Environ. 2009 May 15;407(11):3482-93. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.021. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
10
Ranking tributaries for setting remediation priorities in a TMDL context.
Chemosphere. 2008 May;71(10):1895-908. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.040. Epub 2008 Mar 6.