Ho Margaret Lai Fun, Waugh Russell F
The University of Western Australia, Western Australia.
J Appl Meas. 2008;9(4):331-43.
This paper investigated the use of three types of cohesive devices, that is, reference, conjunction and lexis, used in writing the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) essays for students in secondary year 2, 4 and 6 in Hong Kong. Fifty students from each of the three forms (N = 150) provided narrative and descriptive essays for analysis which were marked by two competent English teachers by counting the frequency of writing devices used per 100 words. Initially, 14 cohesive devices (items) were counted as items for analysis, but two devices (items) were deleted as not fitting a Rasch measurement model. The RUMM2020 computer program with the partial credit model was used to create a linear scale of Writing Devices Used with twelve items: two for references, four for conjunctions, two for lexis, three for cohesive ties, and one for quality. There was good overall fit to the measurement model (item-trait chi-square = 56.81, df = 48, p = 0.18) but the Person Separation Index was very low at 0.08 mainly due to the small range of quality of essays in comparison to the difficulties of the writing devices (items). Students found that the three easiest writing devices used were remote cohesive ties, immediate cohesive ties and mediate cohesive ties. The three hardest writing devices used were temporal conjunctions, causal conjunctions and adversative conjunctions.
本文调查了香港中二、中四和中六的学生在撰写英语作为外语(EFL)作文时使用的三种衔接手段,即指代、连接词和词汇。从这三个年级各抽取50名学生(N = 150),他们提供了记叙文和描述文用于分析,由两名合格的英语教师通过计算每100个单词中使用的写作手段的频率进行打分。最初,14种衔接手段(项目)被计为分析项目,但有两种手段(项目)因不符合拉施测量模型而被删除。使用带有部分计分模型的RUMM2020计算机程序创建了一个“写作手段使用情况”的线性量表,该量表包含12个项目:两个指代项目、四个连接词项目、两个词汇项目、三个衔接纽带项目和一个质量项目。测量模型的整体拟合度良好(项目-特质卡方 = 56.81,自由度 = 48,p = 0.18),但个人分离指数非常低,仅为0.08,主要原因是与写作手段(项目)的难度相比,作文质量的范围较小。学生们发现,使用起来最容易的三种写作手段是远距离衔接纽带、直接衔接纽带和间接衔接纽带。使用起来最难的三种写作手段是时间连接词、因果连接词和转折连接词。