Department of Psychology,University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep;99(3):549-71. doi: 10.1037/a0020386.
Each relationship has its own personality. Almost immediately after a social interaction begins, verbal and nonverbal behaviors become synchronized. Even in asocial contexts, individuals tend to produce utterances that match the grammatical structure of sentences they have recently heard or read. Three projects explore language style matching (LSM) in everyday writing tasks and professional writing. LSM is the relative use of 9 function word categories (e.g., articles, personal pronouns) between any 2 texts. In the first project, 2 samples totaling 1,744 college students answered 4 essay questions written in very different styles. Students automatically matched the language style of the target questions. Overall, the LSM metric was internally consistent and reliable across writing tasks. Women, participants of higher socioeconomic status, and students who earned higher test grades matched with targets more than others did. In the second project, 74 participants completed cliffhanger excerpts from popular fiction. Judges' ratings of excerpt-response similarity were related to content matching but not function word matching, as indexed by LSM. Further, participants were not able to intentionally increase style or content matching. In the final project, an archival study tracked the professional writing and personal correspondence of 3 pairs of famous writers across their relationships. Language matching in poetry and letters reflected fluctuations in the relationships of 3 couples: Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung, Elizabeth Barrett and Robert Browning, and Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. Implications for using LSM as an implicit marker of social engagement and influence are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).
每种关系都有其自身的特点。几乎在社交互动开始后,言语和非言语行为就会同步。即使在非社交环境中,个体也倾向于产生与他们最近听到或读到的句子语法结构相匹配的话语。三个项目探索了日常写作任务和专业写作中的语言风格匹配(LSM)。LSM 是指在任何两个文本之间相对使用 9 个功能词类别(例如冠词、人称代词)。在第一个项目中,共有 2 个样本,总计 1744 名大学生回答了 4 个以非常不同风格撰写的论文问题。学生自动匹配目标问题的语言风格。总体而言,LSM 指标在写作任务之间具有内部一致性和可靠性。女性、社会经济地位较高的参与者以及获得较高考试成绩的学生比其他人更能与目标匹配。在第二个项目中,74 名参与者完成了流行小说的悬念片段。评委对片段-反应相似性的评分与内容匹配有关,但与 LSM 索引的功能词匹配无关。此外,参与者无法故意增加风格或内容匹配。在最后一个项目中,一项档案研究跟踪了 3 对著名作家在关系中的专业写作和个人信件往来。诗歌和信件中的语言匹配反映了 3 对夫妇关系的波动:西格蒙德·弗洛伊德和卡尔·荣格、伊丽莎白·巴雷特和罗伯特·布朗宁以及西尔维亚·普拉斯和泰德·休斯。讨论了将 LSM 用作社会参与和影响的隐性标记的意义。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2010 APA,保留所有权利)。