Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性卒中高血糖的务实管理:强化静脉胰岛素治疗的安全性和可行性

Pragmatic management of hyperglycaemia in acute ischaemic stroke: safety and feasibility of intensive intravenous insulin treatment.

作者信息

Kreisel Stefan H, Berschin Undine M, Hammes Hans-Peter, Leweling Hans, Bertsch Thomas, Hennerici Michael G, Schwarz Stefan

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(2):167-75. doi: 10.1159/000185608. Epub 2008 Dec 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with acute ischaemic stroke, hyperglycaemia has been retrospectively associated with negative outcome. There is an ongoing discussion as to which treatment algorithm, if any, provides the most effective prospective intervention. Here we test the safety and feasibility of an intravenous insulin-only infusion protocol designed for pragmatic routine clinical use.

METHODS

40 ischaemic stroke patients with onset <24 h ago, admitted to our stroke unit, were randomized either to the study regimen (50 IU insulin in 50 ml 0.9% saline solution applied intravenously via a perfusor pump), with the aim of reaching and maintaining blood glucose levels between 4.44 mmol/l (80 mg/dl) and 6.11 mmol/l (110 mg/dl), or were treated with insulin subcutaneously if concentrations were above 11.10 mmol/l (200 mg/dl). Treatment was continued for 5 days. Primary outcome was the number of hypoglycaemic (<3.33 mmol/l; <60 mg/dl) and severe hyperglycaemic (>16.65 mmol/l; >300 mg/dl) events.

RESULTS

Hypoglycaemic events were significantly more common in patients treated intensively (total n = 25; incidence rate ratio, IRR = 5.3; 95% CI = 1.2-22.4; p < 0.05). Symptomatic events were rare (total n = 5). Severe hyperglycaemia was associated with conventional treatment (IRR = 4.9; 95% CI = 1.5-15.9; p < 0.05). Though those treated intensively attained near-normoglycaemic levels quicker and had significantly lower blood glucose levels over the study period (6.49 +/- 2.19 mmol/l vs. 8.01 +/- 3.06 mmol/l; 95% CI = -1.78 to -1.28, p < 0.0005), treatment imposes considerable strain on both patients and caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

The intensive intravenous insulin infusion protocol effectively lowers blood glucose levels with an increased risk of manageable hypoglycaemic events. However, a highly motivated and trained staff seems essential, limiting feasibility outside of specialty care settings.

摘要

背景

在急性缺血性中风患者中,高血糖与不良预后存在回顾性关联。关于哪种治疗方案(如果有的话)能提供最有效的前瞻性干预,目前仍在讨论中。在此,我们测试一种专为实际临床常规使用设计的仅静脉输注胰岛素方案的安全性和可行性。

方法

40例发病时间在24小时以内、入住我们卒中单元的缺血性中风患者被随机分为研究组(通过灌注泵静脉输注50毫升0.9%盐溶液中含50单位胰岛素),目标是使血糖水平达到并维持在4.44毫摩尔/升(80毫克/分升)至6.11毫摩尔/升(110毫克/分升)之间,或者如果血糖浓度高于11.10毫摩尔/升(200毫克/分升)则皮下注射胰岛素治疗。治疗持续5天。主要结局是低血糖(<3.33毫摩尔/升;<60毫克/分升)和严重高血糖(>16.65毫摩尔/升;>300毫克/分升)事件的数量。

结果

强化治疗的患者中低血糖事件明显更常见(总计n = 25;发病率比,IRR = 5.3;95%置信区间 = 1.2 - 22.4;p < 0.05)。有症状的事件很少见(总计n = 5)。严重高血糖与传统治疗相关(IRR = 4.9;95%置信区间 = 1.5 - 15.9;p < 0.05)。尽管强化治疗的患者更快达到接近正常血糖水平,且在研究期间血糖水平显著更低(6.49 ± 2.19毫摩尔/升对8.01 ± 3.06毫摩尔/升;95%置信区间 = -1.78至-1.28,p < 0.0005),但治疗给患者和护理人员都带来了相当大的负担。

结论

强化静脉输注胰岛素方案能有效降低血糖水平,但低血糖事件风险增加且可控制。然而,似乎需要积极性高且训练有素的工作人员,这限制了该方案在专科护理环境之外的可行性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验